Re: What's next

From: R. Daniel Braun (rd.braun@gmail.com)
Fri Apr 25 13:37:09 2008


I'm afraids it is mostly the latter. The only harm ever attributed to steroids in pregnancy is related to repeated weekly doses.

Dan

On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Garry E. Siegel, M.D. < garrys@mindspring.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the input, Dan and Ef.
>
> Is there evidence to use steroids as you've suggested, or is it just
> based on experience/obstetric horse sense?
>
> Isn't there a bit of a thought that steroids may have long term growth
> consequences? In other words, there may be harm such that one shouldn't
> use them unless clearly indicated.
>
> Garry
>
> At Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Efrain Ramirez wrote:
> >
> >Agree!!!!
> >
> >Ef
> >
> >At Thu, 24 Apr 2008, R. Daniel Braun wrote:
> >>
> >>Steroids do more than prevent RDS. They also decrease incidence of IVH
> and
> >>NEC, which can still occur after 34 weeks. Risk of giving steroids is
> ??????
> >>
> >>Dan
> >>
> >>On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Andrew Folley <agfolley@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I must have missed how the diagnosis of IUGR was made?agf
> >>>
> >>> > Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 06:11:49 -0500
> >>> > From: cdsb@bellsouth.net
> >>> > To: ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net
> >>> > Subject: RE: What's next
> >>> >
> >>> > I don't give steroids after 34 weeks either. And Garry is right, the
> baby
> >>> > isn't thriving, it's small.
> >>> >
> >>> > But if the fetus were say 30 weeks with IUGR, but with Reactive NST
> and
> >>> 8/8
> >>> > BPP, then I think there wouldn't be such a rush to delivery.
> >>> >
> >>> > So the real question here I think is given an IUGR fetus with perfect
> >>> > testing, what is the EGA we would electively deliver?
> >>> >
> >>> > Everyone may have a different answer. Here is an example of there
> being
> >>> 10
> >>> > different ways to do something in medicine and nine of them not being
> >>> wrong.
> >>> >
> >>> > Charles
> >>> >
> >>> > -----Original Message-----
> >>> > From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of
> Garry
> >>> E.
> >>> > Siegel, M.D.
> >>> > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:47 PM
> >>> > To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
> >>> > Subject: Re: What's next
> >>> >
> >>> > Over 34 weeks--no steroids unless amnio done and lung maturity not
> >>> > proven.
> >>> >
> >>> > Yes, the late preterm baby alluded to in ACOG's Committe Bulletin has
> >>> > more morbidity, etc., but this baby is far from thriving inside.
> >>> >
> >>> > Reassuring testing is nice, but nicer is a baby in the nursery.
> >>> >
> >>> > Deliver her, my friend.
> >>> >
> >>> > Garry
> >>> >
> >>> > At Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Efrain Ramirez wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >No fetal weight gain at all in the last 2 weeks.. umbilical artery
> >>> > >doppler normal.. MCA not done.. mother perceives fewer FM's.. just
> >>> > >like the other pregnancy.
> >>> > >Definitive asymmetric IUGR.
> >>> > >Level III NICU .. I had to deliver in the last year to babies at 26
> >>> > >weeks .. doing well..
> >>> > >Steroids? - it's a Democratic Primary..
> >>> > >Legally speaking an unexpected IUFD would be hard to defend... NICU
> >>> > >complications, IMHO, easier.
> >>> > >Thanks to all.. recommendations well taken.
> >>> > >
> >>> > >Ef
> >>> > >
> >>> > >At Wed, 23 Apr 2008, art fougner, md wrote:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>Middle cerebral artery doppler? Uterine artery doppler?
> >>> > >>If all normal, would suggest (unencumbered by data) twice weekly
> nst's
> >>> > >>with AFI's, weekly dopplers and elective delivery at term.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>Art
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>Just my opinion. I could be wrong.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>At Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Efrain Ramirez wrote:
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>30 some G2, P1 - previous C/S - IUGR - at 36 weeks - apparently no
> >>> > >>>reassuring FHR's.2 weeks at NICU.. at present 34 w and 5 d.. BPP
> >>> > >>>10/10, EFW - 1500-1600 below 5th.. normal umbilical Doppler ..
> what's
> >>> > >>>next?
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>Ef
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>--
> >>> > >>>"I can accept failure, but I can't accept not trying." - Michael
> >>> Jordan
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>--
> >>> > >>art fougner, md
> >>> > >>"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >--
> >>> > >"I can accept failure, but I can't accept not trying." - Michael
> Jordan
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
> >>> > Private Practice
> >>> > Roswell, GA
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>> Make i'm yours. Create a custom banner to support your cause.<
> >>> ------------------------------
> http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Contribute/Default.aspx?source=TXT_TAGHM_MSN_Make_IM_Yours
> >>> ------------------------------
> >
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>--
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>R. Daniel Braun, MD FACOG(L) ABMP CMTh
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>Professor Emeritus
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology
> >>Indiana U. School of Medicine
> >>
> >>R. Daniel Braun
> >>
> >>"Science without Religion is LAME; Religion without Science is BLIND"
> >>Einstein 1941
> >>
> >--
> >"I can accept failure, but I can't accept not trying." - Michael Jordan
> >
>
> --
> Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
> Private Practice
> Roswell, GA
>

--
R. Daniel Braun, MD FACOG(L) ABMP CMTh
Professor Emeritus
Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Indiana U. School of Medicine

R. Daniel Braun

"Science without Religion is LAME; Religion without Science is BLIND" Einstein 1941





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:10:51 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.