Broom brand
From: westsidebirthservice@juno.com ("westsidebirthservice@juno.com")
Sun Mar 2 17:45:13 2008
So, el, since I haven't heard you bash your own midwife wife--what brand of broom does she ride--maybe all of us, ahem, "witches" should get her type. :)
Louana
-- Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.na> wrote:
Yes, of course, the mortality rates were quite desirable then.
el
On Mar 2, 2008, at 18:24, Stmidwife@aol.com wrote:
>
> It sounds like if it were the turn of the century, when my
> GGGrandfather
> practiced rural family practice, nothing different would have been
> done with the
> same outcome. The baby turned on its own. The woman dilated after =
> the
> cervidil was removed. Baby was terrific. I was taught, by a very
> smart USC
> trained OB that part of what you do in practice is from your gut
> instinct/intuition. Anna, you did just this and you were right.
> Life is full of chances.
> Also, el, I am not a witch and don't refer to you as a knife
> weidling butcher
> just because you so c-sects, LOL. I am surprised with your
> impeccable resume
> posted on the OB/Gyn net that you choose to articulate yourself in
> that
> manner.
>
> Sue
>
> In a message dated 3/2/2008 7:22:36 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net writes:
>
> The fact that the witches would consider this a desirable conduct
> of a
> delivery while in reality this was nothing but taking chances, or
> even
> plain failure to do one's duty only reinforces my belief that
> midwives
> should have very narrow scope of practice, with very strict case
> selection
> criteria, executing it well (such as Ms Gaskin, even if she does it
> without
> the most important criteria, in hospital, and with excellent backup).
>
> greetings, el
>
So, el, since I haven't heard you bash your own midwife wife--what brand of broom does she ride--maybe all of us, ahem, "witches" should get her type. :)
Louana
-- Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.na> wrote:
Yes, of course, the mortality rates were quite desirable then.
el
On Mar 2, 2008, at 18:24, Stmidwife@aol.com wrote:
>
>
> It sounds like if it were the turn of the century, when my
> GGGrandfather
> practiced rural family practice, nothing different would have been
> done with the
> same outcome. The baby turned on its own. The woman dilated after
> the
> cervidil was removed. Baby was terrific. I was taught, by a very
> smart USC
> trained OB that part of what you do in practice is from your gut
> instinct/intuition. Anna, you did just this and you were right.
> Life is full of chances.
> Also, el, I am not a witch and don't refer to you as a knife
> weidling butcher
> just because you so c-sects, LOL. I am surprised with your
> impeccable resume
> posted on the OB/Gyn net that you choose to articulate yourself in
> that
> manner.
>
>
> Sue
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 3/2/2008 7:22:36 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net writes:
>
> The fact that the witches would consider this a desirable conduct
> of a
> delivery while in reality this was nothing but taking chances, or
> even
> plain failure to do one's duty only reinforces my belief that
> midwives
> should have very narrow scope of practice, with very strict case
> selection
> criteria, executing it well (such as Ms Gaskin, even if she does it
> without
> the most important criteria, in hospital, and with excellent backup).
>
> greetings, el
>
>
>
D=aolcmp00300000002598)
