-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Eminence vs. Evidence From: DoctorJoe@aol.com Tue Feb 19 10:39:31 2008 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: Eminence vs. Evidence" Previous message: Rafael Haciski: "Re: Entero-vaginal fistula" Maybe in reply to: Dr. John Provatopoulos B.Sc. M.D.C.M. F.R.S.C.: "Eminence vs. Evidence" Next in thread: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: Eminence vs. Evidence" In a message dated 2/19/08 10:23:59 AM, rd.braun@gmail.com writes: > Made prior to Daubert and not changed afterwards. Also if I remember > correctly it was an "Insurance" Corporate decision. i.e. pull it from the market or > no insurance. > And hence, it fits in well with Pastorek's Law. Joe P. Next message: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: Eminence vs. Evidence" Previous message: Rafael Haciski: "Re: Entero-vaginal fistula" Maybe in reply to: Dr. John Provatopoulos B.Sc. M.D.C.M. F.R.S.C.: "Eminence vs. Evidence" Next in thread: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: Eminence vs. Evidence"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:48:50 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.