Dystocia was Episiotomy question

From: Richard Chudacoff (rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com)
Tue Feb 19 09:14:56 2008


When I did OB (and, alas, it looks like I just may be back in that game) I never had patients push without desire. From a practical and medico-legal point (I never wanted to be out of the hospital while a patient pushed) I always labored my patients down to a 4/5 station. While I did induce EVERYBODY at 39 weeks I cannot recall my last dystocia. Do you think there is any relationship to that technique?

--
Richard Chudacoff, MD, FACOG

Las Vegas International Center for Advanced Gynecologic Care

(Specializing in minimally and non-invasive surgery)

2481 Professional Court Las Vegas, NV 89128

TEL: 702-485-8893

FAX: 702-974-0945

Assistant Professor

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

University of Nevada School of Medicine

2040 W. Charleston Blvd # 200

Las Vegas, Nevada 89102

www.lasvegasgyncenter.com <http://www.lasvegasgyncenter.com/>

The information in this e-mail may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received the e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail or phone and delete this e-mail. Thank you.

_____

From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Ina May Gaskin Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 8:10 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Episiotomy question

The baby doesn't want to slide towards the mother's diaphragm with her on all-4s. It wants to come out in this position. It's when she's in knee-chest, with her chest well lowered, that the baby falls up towards her diaphragm. It's important to make the distinction between all-4s and knee-chest.

If babies rose in the pelvis (instead of descending), you wouldn't find the all-4s position so common among indigenous peoples all over the world. (See George Engelmann's Labor among Primitive Peoples, 1882). Google and you can find a digitized copy of these illustrations.

All-4s is good for OP labors, too. Sometimes the baby will rotate on its own or with a little help in this position.

Ina May

On 18 Feb 2008, at 19:44, AllanHo@aol.com wrote:

In a message dated 2/18/2008 10:02:40 PM Eastern Standard Time, elishyde@att.net writes:

Two, if one makes the assumption that most of the weight of the fetus is in its trunk, and that gravity is what it is....would it not make sense that to be on all-4's with hips and knees flexed (enlarging the AP diameter as has been demonstrated radiographically) that the bulky trunk of the fetus to follow gravity and "fall" towards the maternal abdomen, therefore moving the shoulder from behind the pubic symphysis?

Expulsive force is cephalad to caudad, therefore potentially impacting the shoulder even more, and causing stress on the thin LUS. (Plus fundal pressure is indefensible in the US courts).

H-K allows more posterior to anterior movement as well as increases the pelvic diameters.

Betsy Hyde CNM

Branford, CT

=

That's what I thought - getting on all 4's actually makes it less effective for the mother to push the baby out. The baby wants to slide towards the mother's diaphram. So how does it make it easier for the mother to breath like what Ina May said?

Allan

_____

Delicious ideas to please the pickiest eaters. Watch





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:48:50 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.