Re: Pregnancy Problems Tied to Caffeine
From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Wed Jan 23 12:56:36 2008
If you're not pregnant Coffee is Good Again!
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aUTInEjviX0E&refer=us
Stay tuned to the next episode of "As the Pendulum Swings."
Art
At Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Terrence.Jones@kp.org wrote:
>
>This is a multipart message in MIME format.
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>The Quakers would suggest otherwise. /tj
>
>NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this
>e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or
>disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error,
>please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently
>delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or
>saving them. Thank you.
>
>evsono@pipeline.com (art fougner, md)
>Sent by: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
>01/21/2008 15:21
>Please respond to
>ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
>
>To
>Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net>
>cc
>
>Subject
>Re: Pregnancy Problems Tied to Caffeine
>
>I've always thought Dunkin Donuts makes a better cup of coffee.
>
>Art
>
>At Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Gerald P. Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>>Short sell Starbucks!
>>Gerald P. Rodríguez, M.D., FACOG
>>Santa Fe
>>
>>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Dean Huffman ." <dean@thehuffpeople.net>
>>To: "Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L" <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net>
>>Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 12:29 PM
>>Subject: Re: Pregnancy Problems Tied to Caffeine
>>
>>> .
>>>
>>> I agree with you.
>>>
>>> 1) It is really annoying to read an article in a newspaper about a
>medical
>>> journal article and then not be able to find the medical journal
>article.
>>> If
>>> the journal releaases an article to a newspaper, they should make it
>>> available
>>> at the same time (perhaps on their web site) to physicians and,
>perhaps,
>>> the
>>> general public.
>>>
>>> 2) It is not clear what journal this is to be published in. I do not
>know
>>> the
>>> "Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology". Did the NY Times mean
>"Obstetrics
>>> &
>>> Gynecology", "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology", "Journal
>of
>>> Obstetrics and Gynaecology", "British Journal of Obstetrics and
>>> Gynecology" or
>>> what? I have written to the author of the NYT piece, but have not yet
>>> heard
>>> back. The article is not yet listed in PUBMED, either. It is not on the
>>> web
>>> site for the Green (Obstetrics & Gynecology), but I have not yet
>checked
>>> the
>>> Grey Journal (AJOG).
>>>
>>> - - - -
>>>
>>> From: "art fougner, md" <evsono@pipeline.com>
>>> Subject: Re: Pregnancy Problems Tied to Caffeine
>>> Date: Jan 21, 2008 1:16 PM
>>>
>>> Dean
>>>
>>> Supposedly in next month's Grey Journal. One of my pet peeves is the
>>> release of
>>> articles sure to generate media buzz to the press prior to their
>release
>>> to the
>>> physicians who will have to field the phone calls.
>>>
>>> Art
>>>
>>> At Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Dean Huffman . wrote:
>>>>
>>>>.
>>>>
>>>>[NOTE: I have not yet been able to find the original journal article.]
>>>>
>>>>Pregnancy Problems Tied to Caffeine
>>>>
>>>>By DENISE GRADY
>>>>
>>>>Published: January 21, 2008
>>>>
>>>>Too much caffeine during pregnancy may increase the risk of
>miscarriage, a
>>>>new
>>>>study says, and the authors suggest that pregnant women may want to
>reduce
>>>>their intake or cut it out entirely.
>>>
>>> snip - snip
>>>
>--
>art fougner, md
>"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton
>
>Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
><br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">The Quakers would suggest otherwise.
>/tj<br>
><br>
>b></font><font size=1 face="Arial">
>ted
>;If
>you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately
>by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments
>without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you.<br>
></font>
><br>
><table width0%>
><tr valign=top>
>art
>fougner, md)</b> </font>
><br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net</font>
><p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">01/21/2008 15:21</font>
><table border>
><tr valign=top>
><td bgcolor=white>
><div alignÎnter><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Please respond to<br>
>ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net</font></div></table>
><br>
><td widthY%>
><table width0%>
><tr>
><td>
><div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
>list
>OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net></font>
><tr>
><td>
><div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
><td valign=top>
><tr>
><td>
><div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
>Tied
>to Caffeine</font></table>
><br>
><table>
><tr valign=top>
><td>
><td></table>
><br></table>
><br>
><br><font size=2><tt>I've always thought Dunkin Donuts makes a better cup
>of coffee.<br>
><br>
>Art<br>
><br>
>At Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Gerald P. Rodriguez wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>Short sell Starbucks!<br>
>>Gerald P. Rodríguez, M.D., FACOG<br>
>>Santa Fe<br>
>><br>
>
>>>>>----- Original Message -----<br>
>>From: "Dean Huffman ." <dean@thehuffpeople.net><br>
>obgyn.net><br>
>>Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 12:29 PM<br>
>>Subject: Re: Pregnancy Problems Tied to Caffeine<br>
>><br>
>>> .<br>
>>><br>
>>> I agree with you.<br>
>>><br>
>>> 1) It is really annoying to read an article in a newspaper about
>a medical<br>
>>> journal article and then not be able to find the medical journal
>article.<br>
>>> If<br>
>>> the journal releaases an article to a newspaper, they should make
>it<br>
>>> available<br>
>>> at the same time (perhaps on their web site) to physicians and,
>perhaps,<br>
>>> the<br>
>>> general public.<br>
>>><br>
>>> 2) It is not clear what journal this is to be published in. I
>do not know<br>
>>> the<br>
>>> "Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology". Did the NY Times
>mean "Obstetrics<br>
>>> &<br>
>ogy",
>"Journal of<br>
>ics
>and<br>
>>> Gynecology" or<br>
>>> what? I have written to the author of the NYT piece, but have
>not yet<br>
>>> heard<br>
>>> back. The article is not yet listed in PUBMED, either. It is not
>on the<br>
>>> web<br>
>>> site for the Green (Obstetrics & Gynecology), but I have not
>yet checked<br>
>>> the<br>
>>> Grey Journal (AJOG).<br>
>>><br>
>>> - - - -<br>
>>><br>
>>> From: "art fougner, md" <evsono@pipeline.com><br>
>>> Subject: Re: Pregnancy Problems Tied to Caffeine<br>
>>> Date: Jan 21, 2008 1:16 PM<br>
>>><br>
>>> Dean<br>
>>><br>
>>> Supposedly in next month's Grey Journal. One of my pet peeves
>is the<br>
>>> release of<br>
>>> articles sure to generate media buzz to the press prior to their
>release<br>
>>> to the<br>
>>> physicians who will have to field the phone calls.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Art<br>
>>><br>
>>> At Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Dean Huffman . wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>[NOTE: I have not yet been able to find the original journal
>article.]<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>Pregnancy Problems Tied to Caffeine<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>By DENISE GRADY<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>Published: January 21, 2008<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>Too much caffeine during pregnancy may increase the risk of
>miscarriage, a<br>
>>>>new<br>
>>>>study says, and the authors suggest that pregnant women may
>want to reduce<br>
>>>>their intake or cut it out entirely.<br>
>>><br>
>>> snip - snip<br>
>>><br>
><br>
>--<br>
>art fougner, md<br>
>"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton<br>
></tt></font>
><br>
>
--
art fougner, md
"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton
