-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: obstructed labour From: Raymond Stephen (Stephen.Raymond@dhhs.tas.gov.au) Sun Dec 30 07:44:12 2007 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Raymond Stephen: "Re: Breakthrough Bleeding" Previous message: Joe Cutchin: "Re: Gyn: Breakthrough Bleeding" In reply to: =?utf-8?q?Dr. Bülent Potur?=: "Re: obstructed labour" Next in thread: R. Daniel Braun: "Re: obstructed labour" Reply: R. Daniel Braun: "Re: obstructed labour" A T incision is a bad idea because it leaves two points which are poorly supplied with blood and difficult to repair. The J is to be preferred if there is a need to extend a transverse incision. Steve ________________________________ From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Dr. = -- ________________________________ Bülent Potur Sent: Sunday, 30 December 2007 7:09 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: obstructed labour Around here inverted T incision is used instead of J incision. This is because of the fear of extending the incision and repair to a place with vessels and ureter ; CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission. If the transmission contains advice, the advice is based on instructions in relation to, and is provided to the addressee in connection with, the matter mentioned above. Responsibility is not accepted for reliance upon it by any other person or for any other purpose. Next message: Raymond Stephen: "Re: Breakthrough Bleeding" Previous message: Joe Cutchin: "Re: Gyn: Breakthrough Bleeding" In reply to: =?utf-8?q?Dr. Bülent Potur?=: "Re: obstructed labour" Next in thread: R. Daniel Braun: "Re: obstructed labour" Reply: R. Daniel Braun: "Re: obstructed labour"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Fri May 2 04:49:21 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.