Re: The dangers of prenatal steroids

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Thu Dec 27 17:08:22 2007


I first read that as ALTOIDS lol.

Art

At Thu, 27 Dec 2007, Raymond Stephen wrote: >
>You need to look at the ACTOIDS Trial before you go gaga over this
>review, which is 6 years old!
>
>Steve
>
>________________________________
>
>________________________________
>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of
>
>--
>________________________________
>GIN11153@aol.com
>________________________________
>Sent: Tuesday, 25 December 2007 7:47 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>Subject: The dangers of prenatal steroids
>
>http://www.narof.org/docs/steroids.htm
>
>Preemies on Steroids: A New Iatrogenic Disaster? by Helen Harrison
>
>Published in Birth March 2001, Vol.28, No. 1, pp.57-59.
>
>At the Hot Topics in Neonatology conference last December, Dr. Barbara
>Schmidt referred to the year 2000 as "Annus Terribilis" for her
>profession.1 Large studies from the NICHD2 in the US and the EPICure
>group3 in the UK had revealed unexpectedly grim outcome statistics for
>extremely low birthweight and short gestation babies -- a 50% rate of
>disability serious enough to be diagnosed by two to three years of age .
>Because follow up at such early ages reveals only a fraction of the
>impairments diagnosed by mid to late childhood,4 the eventual toll in
>disability promises to be considerably higher.3 Premature birth, it was
>also reported, permanently disorganizes and reduces the size of the
>brain, adversely affecting cognition and behavior.5, 6 The more
>premature the infant, the smaller and more abnormal the brain.5 Adult
>cardiovascular disease, underdeveloped kidneys and diabetes were further
>linked to low birth weight. 7 It had become increasingly apparent that
>improved survival among extremely preterm infants was producing greater
>numbers of children with permanent health impairments and handicaps.8
>Further, some of this disability was linked to iatrogenic causes,2 a
>result of the continued haphazard use of poorly evaluated therapies in
>perinatal and neonatal care. 9, 10
>
>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
>
>other purpose.
>

--
art fougner, md
"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:48:21 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.