Re: The dangers of prenatal steroids

From: Raymond Stephen (Stephen.Raymond@dhhs.tas.gov.au)
Thu Dec 27 16:25:58 2007


You need to look at the ACTOIDS Trial before you go gaga over this review, which is 6 years old!

Steve

________________________________

From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of

--
________________________________
GIN11153@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, 25 December 2007 7:47 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
Subject: The dangers of prenatal steroids

http://www.narof.org/docs/steroids.htm

Preemies on Steroids: A New Iatrogenic Disaster? by Helen Harrison

Published in Birth March 2001, Vol.28, No. 1, pp.57-59.

At the Hot Topics in Neonatology conference last December, Dr. Barbara Schmidt referred to the year 2000 as "Annus Terribilis" for her profession.1 Large studies from the NICHD2 in the US and the EPICure group3 in the UK had revealed unexpectedly grim outcome statistics for extremely low birthweight and short gestation babies -- a 50% rate of disability serious enough to be diagnosed by two to three years of age . Because follow up at such early ages reveals only a fraction of the impairments diagnosed by mid to late childhood,4 the eventual toll in disability promises to be considerably higher.3 Premature birth, it was also reported, permanently disorganizes and reduces the size of the brain, adversely affecting cognition and behavior.5, 6 The more premature the infant, the smaller and more abnormal the brain.5 Adult cardiovascular disease, underdeveloped kidneys and diabetes were further linked to low birth weight. 7 It had become increasingly apparent that improved survival among extremely preterm infants was producing greater numbers of children with permanent health impairments and handicaps.8 Further, some of this disability was linked to iatrogenic causes,2 a result of the continued haphazard use of poorly evaluated therapies in perinatal and neonatal care. 9, 10

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER

The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission. If the transmission contains advice, the advice is based on instructions in relation to, and is provided to the addressee in connection with, the matter mentioned above. Responsibility is not accepted for reliance upon it by any other person or for any other purpose.





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 04:55:11 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.