![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: vaginal dysplasiaFrom: Dr. John Provatopoulos B.Sc. M.D.C.M. F.R.S.C. (johnprov@sympatico.ca)Tue Nov 27 10:39:17 2007
At Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Richard Chudacoff wrote: > >I have a patient with a low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and high >risk HPV. Colposcopy only noted a semicircular rang of koilocytic changes >in the posterior fornix. I'm sure there is a medical management protocol >using interferon, but I cannot find a reference. It seems silly to try to >remove this surgically. Can anyone help me? > >-- >Richard Chudacoff, MD, FACOG > > 5% imiquimod seems to be all the rage for low grade perinal,vulvar and anal lesions. Here is a paper for Vular lesions I don't see why it would not be effective for vaginal lesions, the problem is direct aplication without a speculum exam is just about impossible. 5 FU and laser or ultrasound are the other options. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Nov;107(2):219-22. Epub 2007 Jul 25. Links Topical imiquimod can reverse vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: A randomised, double-blinded study.Mathiesen O, Buus SK, Cramers M. Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital of Aarhus, Skejby, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of topical imiquimod in patients with vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN). METHODS: We used a prospective, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Women with biopsy verified, visible VIN2 or VIN3, in a biopsy not older than 2 months were considered. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included, one was excluded before treatment. Twenty-one received active treatment, 10 received placebo. Seventeen (81%) in the treatment group showed complete response, two (10%) partial response and none responded in the placebo-group when evaluated by a biopsy 2 months after a treatment period of 16 weeks. Fourteen of 21 patients (67%) in the treatment group had to reduce the number of applications due to local side-effects. CONCLUSION: The topical treatment with imiquimod 5% was shown in this setting to be very efficient. Local side effects were a common feature, but tolerable after dose reduction. Long-term results are not known, but a planned cohort study of this population will show the rate of recurrences. PMID: 17655918 [PubMed - in process]
--
Take care, John
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:08:53 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.