Re: ACOG Antepartum Record - Pain Scale?

From: Lynn Montgomery (apgar10@thebirthcentermt.com)
Wed Nov 21 11:01:33 2007


I agree completely with Charlie. The hospital pain scale is one of the worst mandates to healthcare in my career. In our hospital, it has resulted in the following:

1. Nurses no longer pay attention to vital signs; they simply ask the patient for their estimate of pain - even to the point of waking a sleeping patient to ask them how the rate their pain.

2. When I get called for a patient "with uncontrolled pain", I always ask for their vital signs, reasoning that if the pulse and blood pressure aren't up, there is likely a disconnect between the patient and the evaluating nurse. Invariably, the nurse calling does not have the vitals available and has to go check - they haven't even evaluated the patient. After all, an over-medicated patient doesn't ring the nurse call button much!

3. The pain scale has resulted in the hospital creating a "Pain Team" to specifically deal with patients who complain of "uncontrolled pain". Physicians who have grown weary of the numerous nursing calls for "uncontrolled pain", based on their pain scale assessment, can now just write an order for the Pain Team to be consulted "as needed". This results in significant additional costs to the patient, who typically just gets her analgesic changed to Dilaudid with Toradol.

4. A postoperative patient in our hospital continued to complain of excruciating pain based on the pain scale and was repeatedly given narcotics without appropriate monitoring and was later found dead secondary to respiratory arrest.

a. During a review of this case, a point was made regarding the contribution of the pain scale to this patient's demise, but despite this, the solution was not to re-address the scale, but rather to get more oximeters with louder alarms so that patients with respiratory depression secondary to analgesic therapy would be detected before they die...

Lynn

--
Lynn D. Montgomery, M.D.

Obstetrics & Gynecology, Maternal-Fetal Medicine

The Birth Center/Rocky Mountain Women's Health

1211 S. Reserve St.

Missoula, Montana, 59801

406-549-0978

fax 406-549-0987

e-mail: apgar10@thebirthcentermt.com

________________________________

From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of ________________________________ Charlie Chambers Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 10:25 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: ACOG Antepartum Record - Pain Scale?

Pain is not a vital sign. It's a symptom. The key is what is the cause, not to go to endless lengths to document the symptom. No one ever died or suffered sequelae from pain alone. I have issues with our current society believing that everything should be painless. No, I don't think people should suffer needlessly, but the idea that we should be able to treat all pain till absent seems hopeless. Plus, it just contributes to all the oxycontin, methadone, etc addiction that exists.

On Nov 21, 2007, at 8:34 AM, ainsron wrote:

It also reflects the recommendation/requirement of the nursing and medical

boards of California that pain be assessed on any patient whose vital signs

are recorded:

"It is now required that all health care staff record pain assessment each

time that vital signs are recorded for each patient. If the institution is

using the zero to ten pain assessment scale, a recording of pain 2/10,

fulfills the requirements of this law. The Board reminds RNs that pain

assessment is based on patient self-report and that patient's can be asleep

and still experience significant pain; appropriate charting would be to

write "asleep" for the pain rating. Registered nurses will continue to be

required to monitor all five vital signs and take appropriate action based

on deviations from normal. In other words, a competent registered nurse

intervenes when the patient's pain is not being managed according to the

agreed upon comfort level."

Ronald E. Ainsworth, MD, FACOG

-----Original Message-----

From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of ainsron

Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 8:26 AM

To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L

Subject: Re: ACOG Antepartum Record - Pain Scale?

It probably reflects JCAHO's position that pain is the "fifth vital sign."

Ronald E. Ainsworth, MD, FACOG

-----Original Message-----

From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Don Miller

Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 6:31 AM

To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L

Subject: ACOG Antepartum Record - Pain Scale?

Just took a look at the latest ACOG Antepartum record and noticed that

they slipped in a new column in the obstetric flowsheet for "Pain

Scale". Considering that things that ACOG publishes tend to be held up

as a standards of care (especially by lawyers), I'm wondering where this

item came from.

Where is the overwhelming evidence of benefit to the patient or a

multitude of references to elevate such an item to suggest routine

documentation at every prenatal visit? I've done a cursory look through

PubMed and the ACOG website and haven't found anything.

If there is such data, could someone please illuminate me as to the

value of this new column and the proper response to patients who

repeatedly say they have pain? What are the next diagnostic steps to

defend oneself when a patient reports and you document continual pain?

OR, is this designed to be defensive legal strategy to counteract

patients with bad outcomes who said they were always in pain and there

was no documentation of such (or the absence of pain)?

My worst fear is that this was a pet project or self-serving agenda

lobbied by someone on the committee that creates the form and is not

evidence-based and adds one more task, one more question.. This is in

the face of real evidence that suggests that urine dipstick testing for

sugar and protein provides no benefit and probably should be dropped

from routine prenatal care and from all prenatal forms.

So, what's the story?

--

Donald W. Miller, Jr., MD, FACOG

eNATAL, LLC

http://www.eNATAL.com

************************************************************************ ****

Charlie Chambers

Hood River, OR

cchamber@alumni.rice.edu

"Almost anything you do will seem insignificant but it is very important

that you do it....You must be the change you wish to see in the world"

-- Mahatma Ghandi.

************************************************************************ *******





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:48:03 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.