-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Legal Malpractice Suit Against Personal Injury Lawyers Permitted to Go Forward From: DoctorJoe@aol.com Wed Oct 31 22:12:47 2007 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Henry Gregor: "Re: Gyn: Positive margins on a LEEP" Previous message: Douglas Krell: "Re: Vag hyst after C/S ... was Positive margins." Maybe in reply to: Dean Huffman .: "Legal Malpractice Suit Against Personal Injury Lawyers Permitted to Go Forward" In a message dated 10/31/07 5:09:06 PM, dean@thehuffpeople.net writes: > > A New York judge has permitted a legal malpractice suit to proceed against a > group of personal injury lawyers who tried to argue that the medical > malpractice suit they allegedly botched had no merit in the first place. > That's basically the burden of proof in a legal malpractice case. You have to show the original case had merit. If they screwed up a case that had NO merit, then there's no malpractice. Joe P. Next message: Henry Gregor: "Re: Gyn: Positive margins on a LEEP" Previous message: Douglas Krell: "Re: Vag hyst after C/S ... was Positive margins." Maybe in reply to: Dean Huffman .: "Legal Malpractice Suit Against Personal Injury Lawyers Permitted to Go Forward"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:08:29 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.