Re: Vag hyst after C/S ... was Positive margins.

From: Douglas Krell (dkrell@msn.com)
Wed Oct 31 22:09:21 2007


Does "could it"? always equal "should it"? in this context? Douglas Krell MD

>From: "R. Daniel Braun" <rd.braun@gmail.com>
>Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>
>Subject: Re: Vag hyst after C/S ... was Positive margins.
>Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:08:34 -0500
>
>The pubic arch is the limiting factor in suitability for Vag. Hyst. Not
>uterine size, not parity, not previous surgery.
>My comment about 6 prior C/S was with the idea that there aren't very many
>women out there who have had 6.
>I personally have never done a vag. hyst on a uterus greater than 28
>(twenty-eight) weeks size (22050 gm). It took a while to do, but she went
>home the next morning.
>
>When the residents wanted to staff a TAH or LVH, I would always ask them:
>"Why can't it be done vaginally?"
>
>Dan
>





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:08:29 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.