Re: 100 lbs wieght gain, o.p. multip

From: Efrain Ramirez (eramirezt@coqui.net)
Sat Oct 20 18:09:43 2007


Obstetrics & Gynecology 2007;110:873-879 © 2007 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists This Article

Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted

Services

Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager

Google Scholar

Articles by Le Ray, C. Articles by Goffinet, F.

PubMed

PubMed Citation Articles by Le Ray, C. Articles by Goffinet, F.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ORIGINAL ARTICLES --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manual Rotation in Occiput Posterior or Transverse Positions
Risk Factors and Consequences on the Cesarean Delivery Rate
Camille Le Ray, MD, Pauline Serres, Thomas Schmitz, MD, Dominique
Cabrol, MD, PhD and François Goffinet, MD, PhD
>From Maternité Cochin Port Royal, Paris, France.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk factors for failure of manual rotation in patients with occiput posterior or transverse positions during labor and to study the cesarean rate according to the success of the rotation.

METHODS: Case-control study comparing failure and success of manual rotation. Cases were all fetuses for whom rotation failed. We used computerized randomization (without matching) to select one control with a successful rotation during the same period for each case with a failed rotation. Maternal, neonatal, and obstetric risk factors for failed rotation were studied with bivariable and multivariable analyses. Mode of delivery was analyzed according to success of the rotation.

RESULTS: During the study period, manual rotations were performed in 796 patients. The procedure failed in 77 (9.7%) women. Attempted rotation before full dilatation tripled the risk of failure in comparison with rotation at full dilatation (adjusted odds ratio 3.4, 95% confidence interval 1.3–8.6), and rotation for failure to progress quadrupled that risk in comparison with prophylactic rotation (adjusted odds ratio 3.3, 95% confidence interval 1.2–8.5). Failure of manual rotation was associated with a higher cesarean delivery rate than was success (58.8% compared with 3.8%, P<.001). All women with unsuccessful manual rotations who delivered vaginally delivered in the occiput posterior position, and all women with successful manual rotation delivering vaginally delivered in the occiput anterior position.

CONCLUSION: Manual rotation may be an effective technique for reducing the cesarean delivery rate in patients with an occiput posterior or transverse position during labor. The success or failure of attempted manual rotation depends upon obstetric conditions, including the indication for rotation and cervical dilatation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II

Ef

At Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Ronald Ainsworth wrote: > >Had one like that last night. First baby was 6# 7oz. >I induced her this time at 40wk 2d, amniotomy. She >moved steadily to complete, but the nurse didn't wake >me up until 1:30AM when she had been pushing for 1-1/2 >hours and was getting fatigued. When I checked her >she was obviously OP at +3 and the anterior vaginal >wall was coming down in front of the head, but she was >complete. First attempt to manually rotate was >unsuccessful, tried again in the opposite direction >and it rotated and delivered in the next two pushes. >No shoulder dystocia, but this one was 10# even, >3-1/3# bigger than her first. She could never had it >posterior, I was fortunate to rotate it. Garry would >probably have put on Kiellands. I would have 15 years >ago. > >Ron >--- "Dr. John Provatopoulos B.Sc. M.D.C.M. F.R.S.C." ><johnprov@sympatico.ca> wrote: > >> 27 y.o. G2 P1 preious low forceps at 38 weeks baby >> was only 6lbs 9 oz; >> Induced today at 39weeks B.P. 150/100 got to 8-9 cm >> but o.p. and >> cervix does not want to go away for 2hrs despite >> augment going to give >> it 1 more hour and call it a day, 100lb wieght gain >> is a concern. >> >> -- >> Take care, John >>

--
"I can accept failure, but I can't accept not trying." - Michael Jordan




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:47:50 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.