Re: 'There is no gold standard for decision-to-incision time' ???

From: Dr Eberhard Lisse (el@lisse.NA)
Mon Oct 8 23:53:12 2007


You could not be more wrong.

The risk (or rather the outcome) is virtually the same. In Canada, at least.

on 10/8/07 8:49 PM emilio porro said the following: > I think we must remember (for clinical and medicolegal problems )for
> which reason or reasons we do or we don't do a cesarean section that is
> a surgical intervention with a minimal but present surgical and
> anaesthesiological risk and conditioning obstetrical future of the
> patient.
> Yours faithfully
> Emilio Porro
> Como-Italy
> http://www.sanbonaventura.com





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:47:50 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.