-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Thin Prep versus PapSure From: Gerald P.Rodriguez (geraldpr@cybermesa.com) Thu Sep 27 10:16:50 2007 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Dr Eberhard Lisse: "Re: Meaning of Unattached" Previous message: Larry Glazerman: "Re: Thin Prep versus PapSure" Maybe in reply to: Efrain Ramirez: "Thin Prep versus PapSure" Next in thread: AllanHo@aol.com: "Re: Thin Prep versus PapSure" I think you have been fed bogus information. Gerald P. Rodríguez, M.D., FACOG Santa Fe > ----- Original Message ----- From: westsidebirthservice@juno.com To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 8:16 AM Subject: Re: Thin Prep versus PapSure The best and most reliable, according to my pathologist, is traditional slide, since in the liquid prep the cells can swirl around and be missed. Louana Next message: Dr Eberhard Lisse: "Re: Meaning of Unattached" Previous message: Larry Glazerman: "Re: Thin Prep versus PapSure" Maybe in reply to: Efrain Ramirez: "Thin Prep versus PapSure" Next in thread: AllanHo@aol.com: "Re: Thin Prep versus PapSure"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:07:59 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.