Re: split infinitives again

From: Dr. Bülent Potur (bpotur@yahoo.com)
Thu Jul 26 07:35:16 2007


Sir, I have hot been there. But I can tell you anyhow that I wouldn't do a hysterectomy on a 6 weeks postpartum lactating woman with a completely involutioned healthy uterus. Regards,

Bulent Potur

At Wed, 25 Jul 2007, R. Daniel Braun wrote: >
>All it takes is to have done a hysterectomy on someone 6 weeks postpartum,
>then you know how hypervascular the uterus is
>
>On 7/25/07, Dr. Bülent Potur <bpotur@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Well Dan,
>> I had just tried to emphasize the hypoestrogenic state
>> of lactating women and the case's similarity in the
>> insertion to a lactating woman in resembling the
>> vulnerability of the uteri of lactating women in the
>> quoted literature.
>> So I do not have the color doppler data of this case
>> or the 6 week post partum uteri in general.
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Bulent Potur
>>
>> --- "R. Daniel Braun" <rd.braun@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I would disagree with the "avascular" part of your
>> > statement. At 6 weeks
>> > postpartum the uterus is still quite HYPERVASCULAR.
>> >
>> > Dan
>> >
>> > On 7/25/07, Dr. Bülent Potur <bpotur@yahoo.com >
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Below is a publication when I had found for a case
>> > report of mine. An
>> > > IUD diagnosed in the pouch of Douglas with vaginal
>> > ultrasound Dirim
>> > > Sep-Oct 2002 31-34) The case also was consistent
>> > with the majority of
>> > > the review below. The IUD had been inserted at
>> > 6th week post partum to
>> > > a lactating women. When the uterus was so thin
>> > and avascular and prone
>> > > to perforation The patient had been referred when
>> > the strings of the IUD
>> > > was not seen at check 2.5 months later insertion.
>> > > Bulent Potur MD Obgyn
>> > > Kirikkale TURKEY
>> > >
>> > > 1: Contraception. 1998 Apr;57(4):251-5.Click here
>> > to read Links
>> > > Perforations with intrauterine devices. Report
>> > from a Swedish survey.
>> > > Andersson K, Ryde-Blomqvist E, Lindell K,
>> > Odlind V, Milsom I.
>> > > Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
>> > Sahlgrenska University
>> > > Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.
>> > > This survey comprised 50 consecutive perforations
>> > occurring with
>> > > intrauterine devices (IUD) reported to the
>> > National Patient Insurance
>> > > Scheme Register during 1990 to 1993. All 50 women
>> > were parous and > 20
>> > > years of age at the time of IUD insertion.
>> > Forty-two (84%) of the IUD
>> > > were inserted by a midwife and eight by a
>> > gynecologist. A total of 45
>> > > women (90%) had their IUD inserted < 1 year after
>> > a full-term pregnancy
>> > 12 weeks after
>> > > delivery. Of the 50 women, 27 (54%) reported that
>> > they were
>> > > breastfeeding at the time of IUD insertion. No
>> > particular IUD was
>> > > overrepresented in relation to its share on the
>> > market. In 31 cases
>> > > (62%), severe pain at insertion and during the
>> > first 24 h was recorded.
>> > > In 14 women (28%), the perforation was diagnosed
>> > early (i.e., within 1
>> > > month of insertion) and in 36 women (72%), the
>> > perforation was diagnosed
>> > > > 1 month after insertion. Lower abdominal pain
>> > was the most frequent
>> > > symptom at early diagnosis but in two cases, the
>> > main symptom was heavy
>> > > bleeding. Among the 36 women in whom the
>> > perforation was discovered
>> > > more than 1 month after insertion, the diagnosis
>> > was made when an
>> > > unexpected pregnancy occurred in 20 women (56%).
>> > In 15 cases, the IUD
>> > > strings were not visible during pelvic examination
>> > at a routine
>> > > check-up, which led to efforts to locate the IUD.
>> > Thirty-two women
>> > > (64%) underwent laparotomy for removal. We
>> > conclude that lactating
>> > > women seem to be a risk group for perforation and
>> > that a national
>> > > register of IUD perforations could provide a
>> > better means of quality
>> > > control.
>> > > PMID: 9649917 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
>> > >
>> > > At Tue, 24 Jul 2007, GIN11153@aol.com wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >Friend asked me about perforation rate. I don't
>> > have an answer but
>> > > thought
>> > > >that it is an accepted complication that is
>> > discussed in an informed
>> > > consent.
>> > > >Your thoughts, please!
>> > > >
>> > > >Gail Neuman RNC CPHW
>> > > >student midwife and student nurse practitioner
>> > > >certified high risk OB
>> > > >Perinatal Nurse Associates
>> > > >801 N. Tustin Ave., Suite 305
>> > > >Santa Ana, CA 92705
>> > > >(714) 314-7070
>> > > >(714) 838-1479 fax
>> > > >
>> > > >************************************** Get a
>> > sneak peek of the all-new
>> > > >************************************** Get a

>> > > AOL at
>> > > >http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
>> > > >************************************** Get a
>> > sneak peek of the all-new
>> > > >************************************** Get a

>> > > AOL at
>> > >





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:07:30 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.