Re: EFM

From: Cesar Molina (cemolar777@gmail.com)
Mon Jul 9 12:19:42 2007


In your place. Can nurse call the phisician directly, without consult with the phisycian in the beedroom???

2007/7/9, Barbara Nicol <blnicol@ix.netcom.com>: >
> First, I'm gonna assume that this is a completely hypothetical case,
> because I know you wouldn't post this much identifying data on a public
> list.
>
> That said, I've encountered variations on this exact case over my career,
> and I've got a few comments to make:
>
> (1) with this kind of tracing, I have certainly seen cases of bad
> outcomes, but I've also seen great babies. This also goes with my
> understanding of the literature - you just don't know whether this baby is
> okay or not, but without decels, I don't believe that labor is injuring the
> baby further, if it is even injured at all. However, it always makes me
> worry about the baby's CNS when I don't see variability.
>
> (2) the baby could have mec aspiration regardless of the mode of delivery
> at this point, and even with excellent delivery gases. This also needs to
> be clear to everyone.
>
> (3) It's great that the RNs are speaking up. It's important to share
> their concerns with the patient.
>
> (4) In other words, this is exactly the moment to involve the patient in
> the decision, sharing with her the doubts and discussion of the team. Her
> personal perspective is extremely important in this decision! If she is
> someone who basically wanted a CS all along, and is only planning one or two
> births in her lifetime, her risk/benefit analysis might be quite different
> from someone who plans 10 births or who strongly values vaginal delivery in
> itself (for whom CS would therefore be much more morbid) and who therefore
> strongly values only doing CS for strict indications. You've got a
> situation where experienced and caring providers have a difference of
> opinion - she's got a right to know that!
>
> My point: It would be ethically wrong to "order a CS" in this situation
> unless the patient is informed of the differing opinions of the team. It's
> not so clearcut. Sure, I'm willing to "order a CS" in a case of cord
> prolapse, but in this situation, I believe that the correct thing to do is
> to ask the patient's physician or midwife to discuss the options, risks and
> benefits with the patient - maybe jointly with you - and have her make an
> informed choice. Be really honest about the limitations of FHR (the RNs
> also may not be aware of its limited predictive ability) and the risks of CS
> and see what her values and wishes are.
>
> and then hope for good luck!
>
> Barb Nicol, M.D., F.A.C.O.G.
>





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:57:04 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.