-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Mg for all??? From: Andrew Folley (agfolley@hotmail.com) Fri May 18 17:34:24 2007 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: All in a Day's Work!" Previous message: GIN11153@aol.com: "Obstetric Essentials Conference 10/28-30 at the Monte Carlo, Las Vegas" In reply to: Dr. John Provatopoulos B.Sc. M.D.C.M. F.R.S.C.: "Re: Finished/VABC" Next in thread: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Mg for all???" Reply: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Mg for all???" Reply: Joanne Bulley, MD: "Re: Mg for all???" Reply: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: Mg for all???" I have to go back to my original question. The literature or at least the article than Ron shared suggests that we should be treating all preeclamptics and all sever PIH with Mg for seizure prophylaxis. I have not been this aggressive and doubt if any of us have been. Should we be more liberal in our using more Mg prophylaxis?? >From: johnprov@sympatico.ca (Dr. John Provatopoulos B.Sc. M.D.C.M. >F.R.S.C.) >Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net >To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net> >Subject: Re: Finished/VABC >Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 15:25:58 -0500 > >At Fri, 18 May 2007, Henry Gregor wrote: > > > >"Dr. John Provatopoulos B.Sc. M.D.C.M. F.R.S.C." <johnprov@sympatico.ca> >wrote: unless the hospital > >wants to pay an ob and anesthesist to be available. > > > >-- > >Take care, John > > > > Might as well add "to pay for the cost of always having an or room open >and available" too...there won't be any forgiveness for the hospital or >providers if everyone's available, but the phsical space is tied up with >other cases. > > > > H > > > > Hank > > > >In Canada the latest SOGC guidlines (similar to ACOG) had revised >guidlines in 2005 also. They also said hospital should be able to >preform surgery imediately and then about 3 months latter defined that >as 30 min. The guidlines also said ob and anesthesia should be made >aware of all labouring VBACS, our department reviewed it and said we >really don't have to be made aware, I think I was the only one who >didn't object to be made aware of all labouring VBAC's when I am on >call. > >-- > Take care, John Next message: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: All in a Day's Work!" Previous message: GIN11153@aol.com: "Obstetric Essentials Conference 10/28-30 at the Monte Carlo, Las Vegas" In reply to: Dr. John Provatopoulos B.Sc. M.D.C.M. F.R.S.C.: "Re: Finished/VABC" Next in thread: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Mg for all???" Reply: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Mg for all???" Reply: Joanne Bulley, MD: "Re: Mg for all???" Reply: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: Mg for all???"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 04:53:28 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.