-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Abortion? ... here we go again! Sheesh! -->ConLaw now! From: Raymond Stephen (stephen.raymond@dhhs.tas.gov.au) Mon Apr 30 17:50:11 2007 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Raymond Stephen: "Re: Methotrexate" Previous message: Henry Gregor: "Re: Abortion? ... here we go again! Sheesh! -->ConLaw now!" In reply to: art fougner, md: "Re: Abortion? ... here we go again! Sheesh! -->ConLaw now!" Next in thread: Joe Cutchin: "Re: Abortion? ... here we go again! Sheesh! -->ConLaw now!" I think the distinction should be emphasised between "less laws" and too little regulation. By the way, that should be "fewer laws". Steve -----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of art fougner, md Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2007 1:20 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Abortion? ... here we go again! Sheesh! -->ConLaw now! The US federal tax code today covers 17,000 pages and requires over 700 different forms. Does this speak for too little regulation? LOL. Art At Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote: > >The Germans regulate most everything, so do the UK and in particular the >nordic countries, whereas the mantra of the US is deregulation :-)-O > >el > >on 4/30/07 3:35 PM Joe Cutchin said the following: >> El: I know you are baiting us but- we have less laws??? Joe C >> >> Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote: >> >>> I agree, but why is this so different in the US which has much less laws >>> than other places? >>> >>> el CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission. If the transmission contains advice, the advice is based on instructions in relation to, and is provided to the addressee in connection with, the matter mentioned above. Responsibility is not accepted for reliance upon it by any other person or for any other purpose. Next message: Raymond Stephen: "Re: Methotrexate" Previous message: Henry Gregor: "Re: Abortion? ... here we go again! Sheesh! -->ConLaw now!" In reply to: art fougner, md: "Re: Abortion? ... here we go again! Sheesh! -->ConLaw now!" Next in thread: Joe Cutchin: "Re: Abortion? ... here we go again! Sheesh! -->ConLaw now!"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:46:26 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.