-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Abortion? ... here we go again! Sheesh! -->ConLaw now! From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com) Mon Apr 23 07:54:30 2007 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: =?UTF-8?Q?Bülent_Potur?=: "Re: Tubular, Schmulbular" Previous message: Dr Eberhard Lisse: "Re: Abortion? ... here we go again! Sheesh! -->ConLaw now!" In reply to: Dr Eberhard Lisse: "Re: Abortion? ... here we go again! Sheesh! -->ConLaw now!" Next in thread: acmidwife@netscape.net: "Re: Abortion? ... here we go again! Sheesh! -->ConLaw now!" Many call that "Legislating from the bench." Art At Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote: > >I did not write that something like this is written into the >Constitution, however, the Supreme Court seems to see it different from you. > >el > >on 4/23/07 1:02 PM ConLaw now!">DoctorJoe@aol.com said the following: >> >> In a message dated 4/23/07 12:17:09 AM, el@lisse.NA writes: >> >>> As far as I understand the US Constitution there is separation of chruch >>> and state. But then as Gerry would say, I am often wrong. >> >> Exactly. That is, the latter is exactly right. LOL >> >> The U.S. Constitution has no such animal. It merely says that the State >> cannot FAVOR one over the other. The "Separation" concept is a newly >> created thing which really has no basis in the document itself or in the >> Founding Fathers' writings or early jurisprudence. In fact, some of the >> current argument is actually unconstitutional, as it prohibits free >> exercise. >> >> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or >> prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . . . U.S. Const. Amend. I. >> >> Joe P. >> > >-- >Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) >ConLaw now!">el@lisse.NA el108-ARIN / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) >PO Box 8421 \ / Please do NOT email to this address >Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/ if it is DNS related in ANY way > -- art fougner, md "May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton Next message: =?UTF-8?Q?Bülent_Potur?=: "Re: Tubular, Schmulbular" Previous message: Dr Eberhard Lisse: "Re: Abortion? ... here we go again! Sheesh! -->ConLaw now!" In reply to: Dr Eberhard Lisse: "Re: Abortion? ... here we go again! Sheesh! -->ConLaw now!" Next in thread: acmidwife@netscape.net: "Re: Abortion? ... here we go again! Sheesh! -->ConLaw now!"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:06:44 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.