![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: Lap chole...vaginal editionFrom: ainsron (ainsron@sbcglobal.net)Fri Apr 20 14:17:23 2007
It's interesting that we learned long ago to avoid vaginal tubal ligations because of the increased risk of infection associated with vaginal entrance for clean surgeries. The last one I did was on a belly dancer who wanted to avoid an abdominal incision at all costs, even a small one. The general surgeons I know wouldn't want to go anywhere near the vagina, professionally at least. Ronald E. Ainsworth, MD, FACOG -----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Henry Gregor Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 12:10 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Lap chole...vaginal edition "Dr. John Provatopoulos B.Sc. M.D.C.M. F.R.S.C." <johnprov@sympatico.ca> wrote: \Sounds like a gimick, it does not sound like he only used a vaginal route, so whats the point if he still used abdominal laparscopy punctures. Pain and recovery is related to the size and number of incisions. If he did the procedure completely vaginally that would be something to harp about.
-- Take care, John
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:07:49 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.