Re: Connecticut considers 3% tax on physician revenue
From: DoctorJoe@aol.com
Thu Mar 15 06:52:47 2007
In a message dated 3/14/07 8:24 pm, islesannie@gmail.com writes:
<< Hey - I like that one. Tax the plastic and the esthetic / cosmetic / laser stuff that folks will shell out fresh hard cash for. But they balk at paying their $15 co-pay at time of visit to us! >>
No doubt one of the reasons many "uninsured" ARE uninsured. They save their
money for important things (like D cups), rather than hospitalization coverage,
etc.
Joe P.
>From nobody@medispecialty.com Thu Mar 15 08:49:48 2007
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
by dns.obgyn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/dsb-1.1) id l2FDnmw23865
for OB-GYN-L@OBGYN.net; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:49:48 -0500
Message-Id: <200703151349.l2FDnmw23865@dns.obgyn.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:49:47 -0500 (CDT)
Errors-To: postmaster@medispecialty.com
Reply-To: evsono@pipeline.com
From: evsono@pipeline.com (art fougner, md)
To: OB-GYN-L@OBGYN.net
In-Reply-To:
X-Original-Sender: @ 66.134.31.4
Subject: Re: Connecticut considers 3% tax on physician revenue
Or that health insurance is becoming less affordable ... even for
employers. Copays increasing, Premiums increasing, reimbursements ...
declining. Hmmm, you know something is happening, but ya don't know
what it is. Do you, Dr. Jones?
Art
"Look out, kid. They keep it all hid."
At Thu, 15 Mar 2007, DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote:
>
>In a message dated 3/14/07 8:24 pm, islesannie@gmail.com writes:
>>
>No doubt one of the reasons many "uninsured" ARE uninsured. They save their
>money for important things (like D cups), rather than hospitalization coverage,
>etc.
>
>Joe P.
>
--
art fougner, md
"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton
|
|
