-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Ob: Preeclampsia From: Garry E. Siegel, M.D. (garrys@mindspring.com) Tue Mar 6 18:21:10 2007 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Ob: Preeclampsia" Previous message: johnprov@sympatico.com: "Re: Tumor question" In reply to: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: Ob: Preeclampsia" Next in thread: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Ob: Preeclampsia" Reply: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Ob: Preeclampsia" Reply: Joe: "Re: Ob: Preeclampsia" Reply: Andrew Folley: "Re: Ob: Preeclampsia" Reply: art fougner, md: "Re: Ob: Preeclampsia" 35w4d Vertex #1, Breech #2 To L and D: Hematocrit, SGOT, platelets all fine. BP max 150/95, 2+ protein on hospital u/a. I posted to discuss HOW to deliver; to me, it was clear that she needed delivery (sorry, whoever suggested bedrest) at this gestational age and obvious mild pre-eclampsia. What would be gained by delaying delivery? I discussed C/S versus induction and recommended a C/S--done at later that day, and all is well. Garry At Tue, 6 Mar 2007, DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote: > >In a message dated 3/5/2007 9:16:17 P.M. Central Standard Time, >garrys@mindspring.com writes: > >24 YO P0000 at 35w4d, V/Br concordant twins. > >On a routine visit today, BP 150/95 times several, 4 pound weight gain, >1+ voided protein, DTR 2+, edema 2+, cervix 1.5/50/-2. Baseline BPs 100 >to 110/60 to 70. > >What's next? > >Isn't 36 weeks "term" for twins? And isn't C/S the route of choice, >generally speaking, for twins? And isn't hypertension/proteinuria/edema ... well, you >get the idea. > >Joe P. > >"Chuck Norris doesn't have proteinuria. His urine IS protein -- of high >quality with essential amino acids." > >http://www.aol.com. -- Garry E. Siegel, M.D. Private Practice Roswell, GA Next message: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Ob: Preeclampsia" Previous message: johnprov@sympatico.com: "Re: Tumor question" In reply to: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: Ob: Preeclampsia" Next in thread: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Ob: Preeclampsia" Reply: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Ob: Preeclampsia" Reply: Joe: "Re: Ob: Preeclampsia" Reply: Andrew Folley: "Re: Ob: Preeclampsia" Reply: art fougner, md: "Re: Ob: Preeclampsia"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Sun Nov 2 04:58:26 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.