-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: A Necessary Vaccine [NYT Editorial] From: Henry Gregor (henrygregor@yahoo.com) Tue Feb 27 15:57:35 2007 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Andrew Folley: "Re: Cost of antenatal testing" Previous message: Henry Gregor: "Re: A Necessary Vaccine [NYT Editorial]" In reply to: Lynn Montgomery: "Re: A Necessary Vaccine [NYT Editorial]" Next in thread: art fougner, md: "Re: A Necessary Vaccine [NYT Editorial]" Follow the money...and how about the lab reps advising typing by hpv strains prevaccination to r/o preexisiting exposure...at least one with a separate charge for each PCR tested strain, as well! This thing has got legs for sure! Lynn Montgomery <apgar10@qwest.net> wrote: v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) } I agree with Joe, “Its not just about the money, its all about the money”. A prime example is a presentation by a Merck sponsored physician when asked about the vaccination for other high-risk HPV strains, he stated that it is “in development”. So, there will be another round of vaccinations, and another and so on. Brings to mind as to whether this is a “planned” staged release, which will enable the company to charge for each round of vaccinations as they are “developed”. Really no different than the big electronics companies and their planned obsolescence of video games and gaming systems – need a new one each year – remember the 8 track tape… Lynn Lynn D. Montgomery, M.D. Obstetrics & Gynecology, Maternal-Fetal Medicine The Birth Center/Rocky Mountain Women's Health 1211 S. Reserve St. Missoula, Montana, 59801 406-549-0978 fax 406-549-0987 e-mail: apgar10@qwest.net --------------------------------- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of DoctorJoe@aol.com --------------------------------- Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 5:31 AM -- --------------------------------- To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: A Necessary Vaccine [NYT Editorial] In a message dated 2/26/07 8:33:59 PM, henrygregor@yahoo.com writes: Fascinating editorial position for a paper that has been on record for decades in opposition to any governmental interference with a woman's right to choose what is or isn't done to her body, in particular re her reproductive systems. I wonder if anyone there even remotely thought of the irony.....what next, support for legal rules re what can or cannot be done for/to pregnant women ?....when I see stuff this droll, it makes me wish either Oscar Wilde or HL Mencken were still with us to share their incisive skills of observation and commentary. Perhaps Joe Queenan (author of Balsamic Dreams) will step up and pick up the challenge for our departed social observers. Maybe because the woman and her "rights" are NOT the governing issue. Irony? A bunch of guys on an airplane singing a song by a musical group that was killed in an airplane crash. But that's not important right now . . . . In cases like this, the truth will always set you free: Follow the money! And personally, I don't like balsalmic. I prefer Regina® Red Wine Vinegar as my salad component of choice. Joe P. "Chuck Norris can win a game of Trivial Pursuit with one roll of the dice, and without answering a single question... just a nod of the head, and a stroke of the beard." --------------------------------- 8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time --------------------------------- with theYahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut. --------------------------------- Next message: Andrew Folley: "Re: Cost of antenatal testing" Previous message: Henry Gregor: "Re: A Necessary Vaccine [NYT Editorial]" In reply to: Lynn Montgomery: "Re: A Necessary Vaccine [NYT Editorial]" Next in thread: art fougner, md: "Re: A Necessary Vaccine [NYT Editorial]"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:46:00 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.