Re: Applying NICHD Terminology and other factors to EFM Interpretation

From: Robert J. Carpenter, Jr. MD, JD (zygote@icsi.net)
Sun Feb 25 15:10:52 2007


My understanding of the original consensus conference was that instead of the defined ST & LT variability, solely variability using previous definitions as used in this monograph was selected. Examples were also given but the original defined NFHR as 110-170 which this says is 110-160.

On 25 Feb 2007 at 15:04, R. Daniel Braun wrote:

>
> Where does this differ from the AWHONN document? or for that matter Ed Hon's original
> definitions in the late 60's?
>
> Dan

Robert J Carpenter, Jr. MD 3420 Tangley Street Houston, Texas 77005-2248

713-664-8888





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:46:00 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.