![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: Applying NICHD Terminology and other factors to EFM InterpretationFrom: Robert J. Carpenter, Jr. MD, JD (zygote@icsi.net)Sun Feb 25 15:10:52 2007
My understanding of the original consensus conference was that instead of the defined ST & LT variability, solely variability using previous definitions as used in this monograph was selected. Examples were also given but the original defined NFHR as 110-170 which this says is 110-160. On 25 Feb 2007 at 15:04, R. Daniel Braun wrote:
> Robert J Carpenter, Jr. MD 3420 Tangley Street Houston, Texas 77005-2248 713-664-8888
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:46:00 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.