Re: Failed tubal ligations

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Sun Feb 11 09:43:47 2007


In your original post, this patient was asymptomatic. I suspect you've done at least one more beta since you first posted?

Art

At Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Elrod, Darryl G Maj 48 MDOS/SGOBO wrote: >
>Other than bleeding like a period, she is completely asymptomatic.
>
>//SIGNED//
>
>D. Glen Elrod, Maj., USAF, MC
>
>Obstetrician/Gynecologist
>
>Chief of Obstetrics
>
>48 MDOS/SGOBO
>
>RAF Lakenheath, England
>
>Telephone DSN: 314-226-8130
>
> Comm: +44 (0) 1638 52 8130
>
>Notice of Confidentiality
>Under the Privacy Act of 1974, you must safeguard all information
>reflected on this e-mail and, if applicable, all attachments.
>Disclosure of information is IAW AFI 33-119, AFI 33-127, AFI 37-131, AFI
>37-132, AFI 33-219, and PL 93-579"
>This e-mail message including any attachments is for the sole use of the
>intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
>information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
>prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
>sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
>Any questions pertaining to disclosure should be directed to the privacy
>officer.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of art
>fougner, md
>Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 3:54 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>Subject: Re: Failed tubal ligations
>
>Why not follow this obviously stable patient with sonograms ( provided
>you trust the abilities of your sonographers) until the location of the
>pregnancy is confirmed? I have seen at least a dozen cases now of
>purported ectopics treated with MTX only to learn the pregnancy was
>intrauterine. Is your patient currently symptomatic?
>
>Art
>
>At Sun, 11 Feb 2007, R. Daniel Braun wrote:
>>
>>Why not do a Menstrual aspiration in the office?????
>>Dan
>>
>>On 2/10/07, Garry E. Siegel, M.D. <garrys@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> You are right--I should have mentioned to let the HCG get higher,
>maybe
>>> 2000, then scan and then, when all points to the diagnosis, go to the
>>> OR.
>>>
>>> I could also accept simply doing a curettage, and if negative for
>villi,
>>> then methotrexate. Many of my patients prefer to go ahead and have a
>>> concurrent lapscope since they're already there, though it may be how
>I
>>> present it.
>>>
>>> Garry
>>>
>>> At Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Efrain Ramirez wrote:
>>> >
>>> >Garry - I am not a laparoscopist - don't you think that you can
>>> >miss..i.e see "nothing" with a very small ectopic --? Why not to
>medical
>>> >treatment?
>>> >Vasectomy would be another alternative if appropriate.. avoiding
>>> >surgery, anesthesia.. just my opinion.
>>> >
>>> >Ef
>>> >
>>> >>At Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Garry E. Siegel, M.D. wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>Andrew:
>>> >>
>>> >>It is my guess based on what I've heard so far.
>>> >>
>>> >>In my prior post, I suggested a D and C and Lapscope/TL--you can
>solve
>>> >>it all in one setting.
>>> >>
>>> >>Garry
>>> >>
>>> >>At Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Andrew Folley wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>What is your proof again, that it is an ectopic and not a noviable
>IUP?
>>> >>>
>>> >>>>From: garrys@mindspring.com (Garry E. Siegel, M.D.)
>>> >>>>Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
>>> >>>>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>
>>> >>>>Subject: Re: Failed tubal ligations
>>> >>>>Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:28:35 -0600
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>It's an ectopic!
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>Garry
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>At Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Elrod, Darryl G Maj 48 MDOS/SGOBO wrote:
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >Maybe not 100% but the quants are slowly rising, she has passed
>what
>>> >>>> >path called a deciualized cast and she continues to bleed.
>Based on
>>> >>>> >that scenario I would find it hard to suggest that this is a
>normal
>>> >>>> >pregnancy.
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >As is said here often...but I could be wrong.
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >Glen
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >//SIGNED//
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >D. Glen Elrod, Maj., USAF, MC
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >Obstetrician/Gynecologist
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >Chief of Obstetrics
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >48 MDOS/SGOBO
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >RAF Lakenheath, England
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >Telephone DSN: 314-226-8130
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > Comm: +44 (0) 1638 52 8130
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >Notice of Confidentiality
>>> >>>> >Under the Privacy Act of 1974, you must safeguard all
>information
>>> >>>> >reflected on this e-mail and, if applicable, all attachments.
>>> >>>> >Disclosure of information is IAW AFI 33-119, AFI 33-127, AFI
>37-131,
>>> AFI
>>> >>>> >37-132, AFI 33-219, and PL 93-579"
>>> >>>> >This e-mail message including any attachments is for the sole
>use of
>>> the
>>> >>>> >intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
>privileged
>>> >>>> >information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
>>> distribution is
>>> >>>> >prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
>contact
>>> the
>>> >>>> >sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
>>> message.
>>> >>>> >Any questions pertaining to disclosure should be directed to
>the
>>> privacy
>>> >>>> >officer.
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >-----Original Message-----
>>> >>>> >From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf
>Of
>>> art
>>> >>>> >fougner, md
>>> >>>> >Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 1:37 PM
>>> >>>> >To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>>> >>>> >Subject: Re: Failed tubal ligations
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >Are you certain this patient has an ectopic?
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >Art
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >At Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Elrod, Darryl G Maj 48 MDOS/SGOBO wrote:
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>I have a gal that I did a c-section tubal on 8 months ago
>(with
>>> path
>>> >>>> >>specimens showing tubal segments) that now has a positive home
>>> >>>> >pregnancy
>>> >>>> >>test.
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>Repeat quants have been 191, 282, and 390 at 48 hr intervals.
>Pt
>>> is
>>> >>>> >>without symptoms.
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>My presumption is that this is an ectopic based on the history
>and
>>> the
>>> >>>> >>abnormally rising quants.
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>My plan would be to give her methotrexate now to treat the
>ectopic.
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>When you any of you consider doing l/s to repeat the
>>> tubal? Now? 6
>>> >>>> >>weeks?
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>Thanks,
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>Glen
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>//SIGNED//
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>D. Glen Elrod, Maj., USAF, MC
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>Obstetrician/Gynecologist
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>Chief of Obstetrics
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>48 MDOS/SGOBO
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>RAF Lakenheath, England
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>Telephone DSN: 314-226-8130
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> Comm: +44 (0) 1638 52 8130
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>Notice of Confidentiality
>>> >>>> >>Under the Privacy Act of 1974, you must safeguard all
>information
>>> >>>> >>reflected on this e-mail and, if applicable, all attachments.
>>> >>>> >>Disclosure of information is IAW AFI 33-119, AFI 33-127, AFI
>>> 37-131,
>>> >>>> >AFI
>>> >>>> >>37-132, AFI 33-219, and PL 93-579"
>>> >>>> >>This e-mail message including any attachments is for the sole
>use
>>> of
>>> >>>> >the
>>> >>>> >>intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
>privileged
>>> >>>> >>information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
>>> distribution
>>> >>>> >is
>>> >>>> >>prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
>contact
>>> the
>>> >>>> >>sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
>>> message.
>>> >>>> >>Any questions pertaining to disclosure should be directed to
>the
>>> >>>> >privacy
>>> >>>> >>officer.
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >--
>>> >>>> >art fougner, md
>>> >>>> >"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>--
>>> >>>>Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
>>> >>>>Private Practice
>>> >>>>Roswell, GA
>>> >>
>>> >>--
>>> >>Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
>>> >>Private Practice
>>> >>Roswell, GA
>>> >>
>>> >--
>>> >" The greatest obstacle to knowledge is not ignorance,
>>> >it is the illusion of knowledge." Daniel J. Boorstin - Historian
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
>>> Private Practice
>>> Roswell, GA
>>>
>>--
>>R. Daniel Braun, MD FACOG(L) CMT
>>Professor Emeritus
>>Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology
>>Indiana U. School of Medicine
>>
>>R. Daniel Braun
>>
>> "The way to health is an aromatic bath and scented massage
>everyday".
>> Hippocrates
>>
>--
>art fougner, md
>"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton
>

--
art fougner, md
"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:46:00 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.