Re: Failed tubal ligations

From: Elrod, Darryl G Maj 48 MDOS/SGOBO (Darryl.elrod@LAKENHEATH.AF.MIL)
Fri Feb 9 06:57:20 2007


Parkland and O plain gut.

I talked to the patient today and she seems to want surgery first rather than doing MTX and then surgery.

Glen

//SIGNED//

D. Glen Elrod, Maj., USAF, MC

Obstetrician/Gynecologist

Chief of Obstetrics

48 MDOS/SGOBO

RAF Lakenheath, England

Telephone DSN: 314-226-8130

Comm: +44 (0) 1638 52 8130

Notice of Confidentiality Under the Privacy Act of 1974, you must safeguard all information reflected on this e-mail and, if applicable, all attachments. Disclosure of information is IAW AFI 33-119, AFI 33-127, AFI 37-131, AFI 37-132, AFI 33-219, and PL 93-579" This e-mail message including any attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Any questions pertaining to disclosure should be directed to the privacy officer.

-----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Efrain Ramirez Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 12:27 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Failed tubal ligations

Parkland, Pomeroy, sutures used? - just curiuous..

Ef

>At Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Elrod, Darryl G Maj 48 MDOS/SGOBO wrote:
>
>I have a gal that I did a c-section tubal on 8 months ago (with path
>specimens showing tubal segments) that now has a positive home
pregnancy >test.
>
>Repeat quants have been 191, 282, and 390 at 48 hr intervals. Pt is
>without symptoms.
>
>My presumption is that this is an ectopic based on the history and the
>abnormally rising quants.
>
>My plan would be to give her methotrexate now to treat the ectopic.
>
>When you any of you consider doing l/s to repeat the tubal? Now? 6
>weeks?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Glen
>
>//SIGNED//
>
>D. Glen Elrod, Maj., USAF, MC
>
>Obstetrician/Gynecologist
>
>Chief of Obstetrics
>
>48 MDOS/SGOBO
>
>RAF Lakenheath, England
>
>Telephone DSN: 314-226-8130
>
> Comm: +44 (0) 1638 52 8130
>
>Notice of Confidentiality
>Under the Privacy Act of 1974, you must safeguard all information
>reflected on this e-mail and, if applicable, all attachments.
>Disclosure of information is IAW AFI 33-119, AFI 33-127, AFI 37-131,
AFI >37-132, AFI 33-219, and PL 93-579"
>This e-mail message including any attachments is for the sole use of
the >intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
>information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
is >prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
>sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
>Any questions pertaining to disclosure should be directed to the
privacy >officer.

--
" The greatest obstacle to knowledge is not ignorance,
it is the illusion of knowledge." Daniel J. Boorstin - Historian




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:55:46 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.