Re: Gyn: Breast Cancer/prophylactic oophorectomy/Vaginal Estrogen

From: Andrew Folley (agfolley@hotmail.com)
Wed Dec 13 10:31:20 2006


Indication for TAH BSO is the size of her uterus in this case. Not th ebreast cancer history.

>From: "M.T Hatta" <drhatta@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>
>Subject: Re: Gyn: Breast Cancer/prophylactic oophorectomy/Vaginal Estrogen
>Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:45:06 -0600
>
>A 47 year old patient of mine has Stage 2 Breast Cancer, Mastectomy done.
>No BRCA genes results. She also has Uterine fibroids of 22 weeks size. Any
>indication for Hysterectomy & Oophorectomy. what about the use of Tibolone
>post op for symptomatic relieve?
>
>drhatta
>
>>From: "Andrew Folley" <agfolley@hotmail.com>
>>Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
>>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>
>>Subject: Re: Gyn: Breast Cancer/prophylactic oophorectomy/Vaginal Estrogen
>>Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:30:47 -0600
>>
>>There is no indication for prophylactic oophorectomy in postmenopausal
>>woman withwith either a personal or family history of Breast cancer.
>>Only when 2 primary members have ovarian caner could you make the argument
>>or if patient is BrCA 1 or 2 postive.
>>
>>>From: garrys@mindspring.com (Garry E. Siegel, M.D.)
>>>Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
>>>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>
>>>Subject: Re: Gyn: Breast Cancer/prophylactic oophorectomy/Vaginal
>>>Estrogen
>>>Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 21:02:17 -0600
>>>
>>>No BRCA results--not done.
>>>
>>>She is 59 with a family history that wouldn't normally warrant that
>>>testing.
>>>
>>>Garry
>>>
>>>At Sat, 09 Dec 2006, Bernard Cristalli wrote:
>>> >
>>> >Right.
>>> >Have you got the BRCA1 & 2 results?
>>> >If they're normal her risk is not above the average risk. Of course to
>>> >remove the ovaries will lower her risk, but why then won't we remove
>>>all
>>> >the ovaries we see (in post-menaupausal women)?
>>> >Bernard
>>> >
>>> >Garry E. Siegel, M.D. a écrit :
>>> >
>>> >>Prophylactic for the increased risk of ovarian cancer in someone with
>>> >>breast cancer.
>>> >>
>>> >>Garry
>>> >>
>>> >>At Sat, 09 Dec 2006, Bernard Cristalli wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>>So what's the rationale of this ovariectomy?
>>> >>>BC
>>> >>>
>>> >>>Garry E. Siegel, M.D. a écrit :
>>> >>>
>>> >>>>No.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>At Sat, 09 Dec 2006, Bernard Cristalli wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>>Is there any ovarian cancer history in the family?
>>> >>>>>BC
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>Garry E. Siegel, M.D. a écrit :
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>>59 YO P2002
>>> >>>>>>On Prempro by choice
>>> >>>>>>6/06--lumpectomy, negative sentinel node, early stage breast
>>>cancer
>>> >>>>>>treated with postop RT, no chemo, now on Arimidex.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>Her mother, in her 80s, was diagnosed AFTER the patient, and there
>>>is no
>>> >>>>>>other family history.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>She asked about prophylactic oophorectomy.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>Any thoughts welcome?
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>On another front, do y'all prescribe vaginal estrogen products
>>>(Vagifem,
>>> >>>>>>etc.) for symptomatic menopausal patients with breast cancer? I
>>>do,
>>> >>>>>>though many patients are clearly spooked and won't think of using
>>>them.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>Garry
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>--
>>> >>>>>>Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
>>> >>>>>>Private Practice
>>> >>>>>>Roswell, GA
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>--
>>> >>>>Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
>>> >>>>Private Practice
>>> >>>>Roswell, GA
>>> >>>>
>>> >>--
>>> >>Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
>>> >>Private Practice
>>> >>Roswell, GA
>>> >>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
>>>Private Practice
>>>Roswell, GA
>>

>

>http://toolbar.msn.com.my/
>





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 04:52:07 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.