Re: Intravenously Administered Magnesium Sulfate To Prevent Labor

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Thu Oct 12 06:53:58 2006


All this begs the question concerning the efficacy of tocolysis in general ...

Art

At Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Elrod, Darryl G Maj 48 MDOS/SGOBO wrote: >
>We have still used it, but we know full well that when we transfer
>patients to the NHS, that it will be turned off as soon as they hit the
>door, nearly regardless of gestation.
>
>I can't say that there have been complications from that way either.
>Most of what we send as 'preterm labor' gets sent home in a few days
>from their care.
>
>Glen
>
>//SIGNED//
>
>D. Glen Elrod, Maj., USAF, MC
>
>Obstetrician/Gynecologist
>
>Chief of Obstetrics
>
>48 MDOS/SGOBO
>
>RAF Lakenheath, England
>
>Telephone DSN: 314-226-8130
>
> Comm: +44 (0) 1638 52 8130
>
>Notice of Confidentiality
>Under the Privacy Act of 1974, you must safeguard all information
>reflected on this e-mail and, if applicable, all attachments.
>Disclosure of information is IAW AFI 33-119, AFI 33-127, AFI 37-131, AFI
>37-132, AFI 33-219, and PL 93-579"
>This e-mail message including any attachments is for the sole use of the
>intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
>information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
>prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
>sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
>Any questions pertaining to disclosure should be directed to the privacy
>officer.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of
>Meenan, Anna
>Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 8:12 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>Subject: Re: Intravenously Administered Magnesium Sulfate To Prevent
>Labor
>
>Interesting. We use a lot of Mag in this neck of the woods. I have
>to make a tiny complaint about the fact that, while technically true,
>the statement about infusing epsom salts intravenously may be just
>the teensiest bit irresponsible on the part of a lay publication.
>Conjures up images of injecting IV the stuff that people soak their
>feet in. Could you send me a copy of the Green Journal article?
>Would love to get a discussion going with the residents.
>
>Anna Meenan, MD
>
>>.
>>
>>Intravenously Administered Magnesium Sulfate To Prevent Labor
>Ineffective,
>>Potentially Deadly, Commentary Says
>>
>>Access this story and related links online:
>>http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=40292
>>
>>Magnesium sulfate administered intravenously to a pregnant woman who
>>is about to
>>deliver a premature infant is an unconfirmed, ineffective and
>>potentially fatal
>>treatment, David Grimes and Kavita Nanda of Family Health International
>write
>>in an Obstetrics and Gynecology commentary published in the October
>issue of
>>the journal, the Washington Post reports. Infusions of magnesium
>sulfate, or
>>Epsom salts, commonly are administered to pregnant women between 26 and
>34
>>weeks' gestation for about 48 hours to delay contractions and allow the
>>injection of steroids, which increases the rate of fetal lung
>development.
>>According to the Post, magnesium sulfate can cause side effects that
>include
>>blurred vision, burning sensations, headaches, nausea and "profound
>lethargy."
>>In some cases, it can lead to pulmonary edema, a condition in which the
>lungs
>>fill with liquid, the Post reports. The commentary is a response to a
>study
>>conducted by the Cochrane Collaboration that reviewed 23 clinical
>trials
>>conducted worldwide involving 2,000 pregnant women who had received the
>drug.
>>The study finds that the use of magnesium sulfate did not reduce
>preterm labor
>>and that more infants died as a result of administering drug compared
>with the
>>control group. Grimes and Nanda estimate that about 120,000 U.S. women
>receive
>>magnesium sulfate annually and that its use might be associated with
>1,900 to
>>4,800 fetal deaths annually in the country. According to Grimes,
>physicians
>>seeking to delay premature contractions that can prompt labor should
>use a
>>calcium channel blocker such as nifedipine, which has been proven
>effective.
>>
>>Comments
>>
>>The use of magnesium sulfate is a "North American anomaly" that is
>>predicated on
>>"good hopes and good wishes rather than good data," Grimes said. For
>many
>>physicians, "there is pressure to use [magnesium sulfate] from
>patients, as
>>well as peer pressure" from other doctors, Gary Cunningham, a professor
>at the
>>University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, said. He added that
>the drug
>>has a "powerful constituency" and is an effective treatment for other
>>conditions -- such as preeclampsia, eclampsia or pregnancy-induced
>>hypertension. Michael Gallagher, a maternal and fetal medicine
>specialist at
>>Shady Grove Adventist and Holy Cross hospitals, said, "There is current
>>practice (to use the drug) that is the community standard." He added
>that use
>>of magnesium sulfate is a safe and viable option in some cases and is
>not an
>>ineffective and dangerous drug (Boodman, Washington Post, 10/10).
>>
>>--
>>
>>Additional Comments by Dean Huffman
>>
>>1) When I was in practice in Kansas as an MFM, I had a patient
>>transferred to me
>>from Fort Riley. She was 34 weeks, in labor. She had received MgSO4,
>>Terbutaline, and ritrodrine (the only drug ever approved by the FDA for
>>labeling as a tocolytic -- no longer on the market) and about 10 liters
>of
>>saline, all IV. I heard about her only when she was in the air. On
>>arrival, she
>>was in fulminant pulmonary edema. I immediately intubated her, got a
>pulmonary
>>consultation, and stopped all tocolytics. She delivered a few hours
>later. The
>>baby did fine -- needed only a little O2 by mask. The mother died about
>a week
>>later from ARDS.
>>
>>2) Grimes was one of my examiners for the oral MFM boards.
>>
>>3) If anybody wants a copy of the article from the Green Journal and
>does not
>>otherwise have access, contact me privately (dean@thehuffpeople.net)
>>
>>Dean Huffman

--
art fougner, md
"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:05:04 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.