|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: 'no-fault'From: Terrence.Jones@kp.orgMon Sep 25 16:29:43 2006
This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 0075F02C882571F4_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Thanks, Joanne. Remember: Ina May said "problems". You (and Andrew) have addressed one of these. If "people" understood the distribution of funds to the injured, without the consumption of the intervening system, it would alleviate some degree of skepticism and uncertainty. But there are other woes that feed this ghostly garden. /tj NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you. islesannie@yahoo.com (Joanne Bulley, MD) Sent by: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net 09/25/2006 13:49 Please respond to ob-gyn-l To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net> cc: Subject: Re: 'no-fault' I have heard a couple of talks from Attorneys - including law school faculty - about going to a mal-occurance or no-fault plan. The lawyers and those that feed off this system will fight this one tooth claw an nail. They will say they are worried that the poor citizen won't get his or her day in court, when in fact the problem would be that all those attorneys and the industrial complex built up around the tort system would not have anything to leach off of. only my opinion (!) Joanne
>And so, in the world of vested interests posed as moral principles, it
>another hand reached out for more... and the sky goes on --=_alternative 0075F02C882571F4_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thanks, Joanne. Remember: Ina May said "problems". You (and Andrew) have addressed one of these. If "people" understood the distribution of funds to the injured, without the consumption of the intervening system, it would alleviate some degree of skepticism and uncertainty. But there are other woes that feed this ghostly garden. /tj <br> <br> </font><font size=1 color=blue face="Arial"><b>NOTICE TO RECIPIENT:</b></font><font size=1 face="Arial"> If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you.<br> </font> <br> <table width0%> <tr valign=top> <td> <td><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>islesannie@yahoo.com (Joanne Bulley, MD)</b></font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net</font> <p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">09/25/2006 13:49</font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Please respond to ob-gyn-l</font> <br> <td><font size=1 face="Arial"> </font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net></font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> cc: </font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> Subject: Re: 'no-fault'</font></table> <br> <br><font size=2 face="Courier New">I have heard a couple of talks from Attorneys - including law school<br> faculty - about going to a mal-occurance or no-fault plan.<br> <br> The lawyers and those that feed off this system will fight this one<br> tooth claw an nail. They will say they are worried that the poor<br> citizen won't get his or her day in court, when in fact the problem<br> would be that all those attorneys and the industrial complex built up<br> around the tort system would not have anything to leach off of.<br> only my opinion (!)<br> Joanne<br> <br> >And so, in the world of vested interests posed as moral principles, it<br> >remains "incumbent" that "people" do not understand. /tj<br> <br> >another hand reached out for more... and the sky goes on<br> >forever..." (JM) "I don't know nothin' about, nothin' about no Mexico..."<br> >(PS)<br> ><br> <br> </font> <br>
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:44:47 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.