Re: One layer uterine closure

From: Bernard Cristalli (bcrist@club-internet.fr)
Sat Sep 2 09:15:23 2006


Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Catgut (every version) has been withdrawn from the shelves since the BSE (mad cow disease) here. Bernard

Garry E. Siegel, M.D. a écrit : > Dan, as always, you are the man.
>
> I recall a time a few years ago when the one layer closure was touted as
> the latest here in the US, and then a paper came out with a slightly
> higher uterine rupture rate (Gosh, I think we chatted about it here).
>
> I was using a one layer closure on the thin, laboring uterii which lent
> themselves to it. However, on thick, unlaboring uterii, I might do
> two-layers where the inner and outer halves of the myometrium were
> closed separately, which, in essence, is a one-layer.
>
> After the paper, I have stuck with a two-layer; if laboring and thin
> enough, full thickness for the first, locking suture, and then an
> imbricating, locking second layer. If thicker and not amenable to a
> full thickness first layer, well I do as described above.
>
> Suture? #1 Chromic on the larger CTX needle for the first layer, and #1
> Chromic on a CT-1 for the second, as it is more precise and easier for
> me. I used Vicryl years ago (and it comes on both needles, Dan) but it
> always seemed to tear through the tissue more often.
>
> Locking vs. non-locking? Chromic vs. vicryl? Don't we all think that
> there is enough blood flow and that the pregnant uterus is sufficiently
> forgiving such that it probably doesn't matter, as long as you follow
> good technique? That is my supposition.
>
> Garry
>
> At Sat, 2 Sep 2006, R. Daniel Braun wrote:
>
>> I have used #1 chromic because it has a large needle which makes it easier
>> to close the uterus.
>>
>> a
>> lot shorter because the uterus has started to involute. The suture is the
>> same length that it was and is holding no tension on anything and that is
>> true no matter what type of closure one did, except for interrupted.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> re
>>
>> On 9/2/06, Laure <lfolgar@vianwe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Most of spanish obstetricians are doing now one continuous layer. For
>>> many years, the standard was; first continuous and second a Lembert-like
>>> discontinuous, teorically to avoid adhesions by eliminate the lesionated
>>> uterus contact peritoneum. There´s no doubt about the elegance of this
>>> procedure, but I´m not sure that avoid adhesions. If you have time is
>>> good for training in surgery to residents, without complications. With
>>> residents, one continuos layer make me more than one problem when i was
>>> call for reoperate a opened uterus who lost a knot.
>>> Althoug in Spain VBAC is always tried.
>>>
>>> Economics are making diference in surgery, are we sure this is the right
>>> way?.
>>>
>>> In Spain, cromic are forbiden by a political decision in the mad cows
>>> disaster.
>>>
>>> -----Mensaje original-----
>>> De: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] En nombre de Dr
>>> Eberhard Lisse
>>> Enviado el: sábado, 02 de septiembre de 2006 8:54
>>> Para: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>>> Asunto: Re: One layer uterine closure
>>>
>>> Bernard,
>>>
>>> There is no standard in Europe.
>>>
>>> In Europe there are at least 6 schools of thought that I know personally
>>> of, French, UK, West and East German, Romanian and Russian. And I have
>>> no clue what happens in Spain, Italy and other places.
>>>
>>> The rupture rates have nothing to do with other countries per se, but
>>> perhaps with other techniques.
>>>
>>> I don't think 2 layers is worse than one, takes one minute longer, and
>>> makes me feel better. I *HAVE* seen onlayer closure com eloose once with
>>> catastrophic results.
>>>
>>> el
>>>
>>> on 9/2/06 7:23 AM Bernard Cristalli said the following:
>>>
>>>> One layer closure has been the standard of care here (France, and
>>>> Europe I believe) for the last 40 years. I haven't seen our rupture
>>>> rates at VBAC are higher than others, and we perform a lot of VBACs.
>>>> BC
>>>>
>> --
>> R. Daniel Braun
>>
>> ..
>> Hippocrates
>>
>
> --
> Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
> Private Practice
> Roswell, GA
>





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 05:08:34 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.