Gyn: Elongated cervix

From: Garry E. Siegel, M.D. (garrys@mindspring.com)
Sat Jul 29 10:15:09 2006


62 YO P2002, many years menopausal, has a very elongated cervix, i.e. 5+ cm., that is present at the introitus. On exam, she has a small uterus, and is hypoestrogenic, and really doesn't have an appreciable cystocele or rectocele, and I don't sense any vaginal vault descensus per se. She had two children vaginally, 6-ish pounds, and is a bit heavy, and has a narrow arch.

She is a non-insulin requiring diabetic on 3 oral meds, and is now ready for a hysterectomy for this protrusion, which she has tolerated for years. She has no SUI or incontinence whatsover, no trouble with defecation, etc.

My concerns:

1. I don't think this is such an easy vaginal hysterectomy. 2. Am I missing vault prolape? 3. Should I suspend the cuff anyway--Ashley kindly has taught me a pretty easy way to do a vaginal suspension to the uterosacrals at TVH.

I'm kind of thinking about going to the OR and putting her up for a vaginal hyst, and seeing if her uterus is accesible vaginally by using a tenaculum as a test. Failing that, I could see if I thought starting laparoscopically (i.e. LAVH) would help, or simply do a TAH.

If I can do this vaginally, ovaries would come out if accesible; if LAVH or TAH, then a BSO is added.

Thoughts welcome.

Garry

--
Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
Private Practice
Roswell, GA




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:44:25 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.