![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: 24 week-erFrom: ainsron (ainsron@sbcglobal.net)Tue Jul 18 14:34:43 2006
It's also a situation where it does not hurt to involve the Ethics Committee of the medical staff, if you have one. We have used ours in similar situations. It never hurts to look at these controversial areas from a multi-disciplinary approach. Ronald E. Ainsworth, MD, FACOG -----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Efrain Ramirez Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 7:36 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: 24 week-er INHO the whole issue is lack of communication - the OB should have talked to the parents before, the neonatology department should have been consulted - straight and compassionate but they make the decision - unfortunately I've been there but it is the only way to do it - BTW - http://www.babycenter.com/general/pregnancy/1290794.html Also - Garry's protocol seems very, very reasonable.. Ef
At Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Babycatchers@aol.com wrote:
>
-- " The greatest obstacle to knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." Daniel J. Boorstin - Historian
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 05:08:13 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.