|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Computerised Labour Monitoring systemFrom: Jamie (ajfields@pine-net.com)Mon Jul 3 20:33:09 2006
Why was it discontinued? My worries would be a false sense of security (forgetting that machines can malfunction), yet more watching of machines instead of actual assessment, and ignoring of more "subjective" data if they disagree with the machine. Labor is not precise, and when we try to make it fit into some precise matrix, we end up mucking around with it unnecessarily. Even the currently available CFM is misused. How many professionals who are supposed to know how to work the silly things rely on external toco as a measure of the strength of contractions? How many preterm labor patients are sent home still complaining of cramps b/c "the monitor didn't pick anything up?" How many times is pitocin increased in women who are progressing rapidly, just b/c the monitor doesn't show enough contractions?
At Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Raymond Stephen wrote:
>
-- JFields, RN, BSN
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:54:00 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.