Re: amniotic fluid volumes

From: Raymond Stephen (stephen.raymond@dhhs.tas.gov.au)
Mon Jun 12 23:00:11 2006


It came through to my email (Outlook) all right.

Steve

-----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Dr. Ainsworth Sent: Tuesday, 13 June 2006 1:41 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: amniotic fluid volumes

I'll resend this message tomorrow from my office, half of the message is missing!! Any idea why this and other emails I've sent are truncated? Is it happening at the OB-gyn website, or is it happening in my email program, Outlook??

At Mon, 12 Jun 2006, ainsron wrote: >
>Looks like the best reference is Chamberlain, Manning, et.al;
>Ultrasound 150:245-249.
>The classic article on Amniotic fluid volume in pregnancy is by
>Queenan, his book, Management of High-risk pregnancy. It shows
>amniotic fluid volume or -
>1 SD). How long it takes to reaccumulate depends on pathologic
>process. He states that the fetus produces 43 mL of urine per hour and

>the average studies from 1959 by Hutchinson.
>
>Ronald E. Ainsworth, MD, FACOG





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:44:07 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.