Re: HIPPA violation FRI

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Tue May 30 20:27:51 2006


So why not paint those black-out bars over the eyes? Sheesh ... this is carrying micromanagement to new depths.

art

At Tue, 30 May 2006, D. Ashley Hill wrote: >
>When all the HIPAA stuff came out, one of our office staff became
>concerned, so we made an inquiry. Of course, they could be wrong, since
>I doubt anyone has tested the legality of photos on doctor's walls. Most
>hospitals in our area will not send birth information to local
>newspapers, either, but many parents still do this.
>
>Ashley
>
>At Sat, 27 May 2006, Elrod, Darryl G Maj 48 MDOS/SGOBO wrote:
>>
>>How did the question come up to ask the legal folks in the first place?
>>Granted, most of mine have names and dates on them, but definitely not
>>all of them.
>>
>>Glen
>>
>>//SIGNED//
>>
>>D. Glen Elrod, Maj., USAF, MC
>>
>>Obstetrician/Gynecologist
>>
>>Chief of Obstetrics
>>
>>48 MDOS/SGOBO
>>
>>RAF Lakenheath, England
>>
>>Telephone DSN: 314-226-8130
>>
>> Comm: +44 (0) 1638 52 8130
>>
>>Notice of Confidentiality
>>Under the Privacy Act of 1974, you must safeguard all information
>>reflected on this e-mail and, if applicable, all attachments.
>>Disclosure of information is IAW AFI 33-119, AFI 33-127, AFI 37-131, AFI
>>37-132, AFI 33-219, and PL 93-579"
>>This e-mail message including any attachments is for the sole use of the
>>intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
>>information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
>>prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
>>sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
>>Any questions pertaining to disclosure should be directed to the privacy
>>officer.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of D.
>>Ashley Hill
>>Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 6:15 PM
>>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>>Subject: Re: HIPPA violation
>>
>>Our legal people told us to obtain permission from parents. They sign
>>and date the back of the photo, otherwise we don't put them on the wall.
>>
>>Ashley
>>
>>At Fri, 26 May 2006, Myer Bornstein wrote:
>>>
>>>Well we have baby pictures posted on a bulletin board in the office for
>>all
>>>to see. First since there are no names , who is to know who it is.
>>>Secondly that photography doesn't know the HIPAA law
>>>
>>>Myer
>>>
>>> _____
>>>
>>>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of
>>Meenan,
>>>Anna
>>>Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 8:18 AM
>>>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>>>Subject: Re: HIPPA violation
>>>
>>>So, yeah, don't you get it, Glen? What if someone was to see one of
>>those
>>>pictures and RECOGNIZE the baby? Then they would know that the kid
>>had
>>>been BORN. Don't you realize how traumatic it could be for anyone to
>>have
>>>strangers find out that, way back in their murky past, they had been
>>(gasp!)
>>>BORN??????
>>>
>>>Anna Meenan, MD (world champion at avoiding the camera)
>>>
>>> The photographer then stated that it could NOT be taken at my desk
>>because
>>>all the baby pictures behind my desk were a HIPPA violation if seen in
>>a
>>>picture. Like any good obstetrician, I have a few hundred baby
>>pictures and
>>>several of me with a cheesy grin on my board behind my desk. I told
>>them
>>>its what I do for a living, if they don't like it they can go find a
>>picture
>>>somewhere else.
>>>
>>>So, they didn't get their picture of me since I'm sure if THAT is a
>>HIPPA
>>>violation, seeing my ugly mug in a book is some sort of violation!
>>>
>>>Glen
>>>
>>>//SIGNED//
>>>
>>>D. Glen Elrod, Maj., USAF, MC
>>>
>>>Obstetrician/Gynecologist
>>>
>>>Chief of Obstetrics
>>>
>>>48 MDOS/SGOBO
>>>
>>>RAF Lakenheath, England
>>>
>>>Telephone DSN: 314-226-8130
>>>
>>> Comm: +44 (0) 1638 52 8130
>>>
>>>Notice of Confidentiality
>>>Under the Privacy Act of 1974, you must safeguard all information
>>reflected
>>>on this e-mail and, if applicable, all attachments. Disclosure of
>>>information is IAW AFI 33-119, AFI 33-127, AFI 37-131, AFI 37-132, AFI
>>>33-219, and PL 93-579"
>>>This e-mail message including any attachments is for the sole use of
>>the
>>>intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
>>>information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
>>is
>>>prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
>>>sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
>>Any
>>>questions pertaining to disclosure should be directed to the privacy
>>>officer.
>>
>>--
>>D. Ashley Hill, MD
>>Associate Director
>>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
>>Florida Hospital Family Practice Residency
>>Medical Directo, Loch Haven Ob/Gyn Group
>>Division Director, Dept. of Ob/Gyn, Florida Hospital Orlando
>>Orlando, Florida
>>
>--
>D. Ashley Hill, MD
>Associate Director
>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
>Florida Hospital Family Practice Residency
>Medical Directo, Loch Haven Ob/Gyn Group
>Division Director, Dept. of Ob/Gyn, Florida Hospital Orlando
>Orlando, Florida
>

--
art fougner, md
"I drank what?" - Socrates




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:53:11 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.