Re: Med Insurance

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Thu May 11 05:46:28 2006


Medicine can never be truly cost-effective since nothing we do can prevent the ultimate outcome.

Art

At Wed, 10 May 2006, Joanne Bulley, MD wrote: >
>Insurance: you can't live with it and you can't live without it. As it
>is all FOR profit - the entire motive of the company is to cut their
>"losses" - that is to pay as little as possible for care so as to
>maximize the profit to the shareholders. To anyone who wants to defend
>the for-profit-motive in the insurance industry ... go right ahead -
>might be interesting to read.
>
>Anyhow - in the most recent issue of "Analog: Science Fiction and Fact"
>(July/August 2006) there is an absolutely great and hilarious story:
>"Total Loss" by James Hosek.
>
>The basic story is the main character (Gary) is in a car accident.
>Just before going to surgery for the repair of his bilateral leg
>fractures, an insurance agent comes in. The agent (Crawford) begins
>talking about "total loss" - and Gary understands that to mean the car.
>Well .. it means the PATIENT - and there is a clause in the HEALTH
>insurance policy that if the COST (direct quote from story) "to sustain
>a patient's condition or to repair dambage exceeds the patients
>intrinsic value" ... the "insurer may decline paying further medical
>costs and attempt to recover costs as obtainable from the removal and
>distribution of body parts from the corpse" ... and so they decline to
>cover and treatment for Gary's condition - and plan to wait for the
>complications to kill him and then harvest the organs. The value of the
>organs being decreased because Gary had smoked (but quit years earlier)
>and had not been a teetotaler. Gary and his wife manage to pore through
>the legalese and find a some loopholes. They do find some loopholes and
>it is a great story.
>
>Now, living & working in the medical field - I could see an insurance
>company writing this and getting away with it .... (cynic that I am)
>
>It is a GREAT short story and gave me quite the laugh when Gary had the
>final word with the Agent. If you have access and can get a copy - you
>should read it.
>
>--
>Joanne Bulley, MD
>Keene, NH, USA
>
>At Tue, 9 May 2006, Jamie wrote:
>>
>>Changing jobs is not always optional, and for the vast majority of
>>people paying out of pocket for medical care is most definitely not an
>>option. However much one values a particular physician's care, if one
>>does not have the $65-$100 for an urgent visit, one is not likely to be
>>treated. People without medical insurance end up in the ER for
>>nonemergent care rather than paying out of pocket for primary care.
>>
>--
>"Love is indescribable and unconditional.
>I could tell you a thousand things that it is not, but not one that it is."
>— Duke Ellington, American jazz artist (1899-1974).
>

--
art fougner, md
Support Free Speech
Buy Danish!




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:05:08 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.