Re: FBS and cord blood pH

From: Barbara Nicol (blnicol@ix.netcom.com)
Wed May 10 22:15:35 2006


Jane Helwig published something on this very point, as I recall, showing that vigorous newborns without complications frequently have cord pHs that are surprisingly low. Can't remember the details, but surely she will. Jane?

- Barb

>----- Original Message -----
From: "Dr. John Provatopoulos B.Sc. M.D.C.M. F.R.S.C."<johnprov@sympatico.ca> To: "Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L" <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 6:13 PM Subject: Re: FBS and cord blood pH

> At Tue, 9 May 2006, Jamie wrote:
>>
>>There seems to be some subjectivity in interpreting ABG's, as well, from
>>the timing of section thread:
>>
>>here they wouldn't be considered 'good' either, more a sign that the
>>baby was starting to be affected by it.
>>
>>Why,and where is here? You mean the baby was "fixin' " to be acidotic?
>>
>>How many times do I have to say it - ph<7.0 = acidosis. If it's 7.12 or
>>or 7.02 -it ain't acidotic. Am I wrong? Someone educate me please! Will
>>we know be liable for babies 'heading towards acidosis?"
>>
>>Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG Marietta, GA
>>
>>At Tue, 9 May 2006, Efrain Ramirez wrote:
>>>
>>>I am sure that eventually cord ABG's will be a standard of care... APGAR
>>>score has more than a fair share of subjectivity.. I have been doing
>>>them for more than 20 years - never a regret -
>>>
>>>Ef
>>>
>>>At Tue, 9 May 2006, Dr. John Provatopoulos B.Sc. M.D.C.M. F.R.S.C.
>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>At Tue, 9 May 2006, Jamie wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Who is paying for all these cord gases?
>>>>>
>>>>>At Tue, 9 May 2006, Dr. John Provatopoulos B.Sc. M.D.C.M. F.R.S.C.
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>JFields, RN, BSN
>>>>>
>>>>Hospital bugets its actually recomended by the hospital lawyers.
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>> Take care, John
>>>>
>>>--
>>>" The greatest obstacle to knowledge is not ignorance,
>>>it is the illusion of knowledge." Daniel J. Boorstin - Historian
>>>
>>I know numbers are objective, but if the threshold for concern varies so
>>much, treatment is still not standardized.
>>
>>--
>>JFields, RN, BSN
>>
>
> Babies can tolerate acidosis quite well, that's why most would agree
> that a PH of less than 7.0 is needed with other evedience of multisystem
> comprimise in the first 24-48 hrs of birth in order to begin to blame an
> acute event in labor for the cause of hypoxic encephalopathy. A cord Ph
> of 7.1 is not rare at all I see it in about 1 in 15 delievers, 1:15
> babies don't have hypoxic encephalopathy.
>
> --
> Take care, John
>





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:05:08 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.