-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: where the continued pregnancy endangers the life of the woman concerned From: Anna Meenan, MD (annam@uic.edu) Mon Mar 13 22:28:46 2006 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Elrod, Darryl G MAJ 48 MDOS/SGOBO: "Re: Malpractice in the UK - was colloquialism" Previous message: Dr Eberhard Lisse: "Re: where the continued pregnancy endangers the life of the woman" In reply to: Henry Gregor: "Re: where the continued pregnancy endangers the life of the woman concerned" Next in thread: GA12L@aol.com: "Re: where the continued pregnancy endangers the life of the woman concerned" Very true, though I'm not sure that the excess mortality involves only the parous women. I 'bout strangled my 19-year-old son this week. He's failing three of his college courses at the mid-term. My gorgeous 17-year-old daughter is currently the least of my worries. My ex-teenager (22 y.o.) who totalled three cars in 4 accidents in his younger years is now driving a bus for his campus bus service. -- Anna Meenan, MD At Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Henry Gregor wrote: > >Followup to earlier note: I left out a significant postpregnancy risk borne by most parous women, and only a few nulliparous women....eventual responsibility for teenaged children...a life threatening stressor, fer sure, dude. > > :-) > > Hank > >Jamie <ajfields@pine-net.com> wrote: > tangent here, but how do the risks of pregnancy and birth in otherwise >healthy women compare to the risks of nulliparity in otherwise healthy >women? > >At Mon, 13 Mar 2006, GA12L@aol.com wrote: >> >>In a message dated 13/03/2006 17:33:03 GMT Standard Time, doctorjoe@aol.com >>writes: >> >>Gail , you're MISSING THE POINT! >> >>No don't shake, I'll get brain damage...ok, it'll be damaged further. >>You're right, I was so busy arguing that pregnancy is safer than it was I forgot >>what you said in an earlier post which is a pregnant woman is more at risk of >>death than a non-pregnant woman. >> >><>you from understanding what WE'RE saying, and how bad you look fighting a >>senseless battle.>> >> >>You're right, I misunderstood through my own blinkerdness. I hadn't thought >>of myself as having a midwife chip but then you don't always see what's >>under your nose until someone points it out. >> >>But what the heck. I have no worries about admitting that I get it wrong >>and that I did misunderstand. >> >>Gail > >-- >JFields, RN, BSN > >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > Next message: Elrod, Darryl G MAJ 48 MDOS/SGOBO: "Re: Malpractice in the UK - was colloquialism" Previous message: Dr Eberhard Lisse: "Re: where the continued pregnancy endangers the life of the woman" In reply to: Henry Gregor: "Re: where the continued pregnancy endangers the life of the woman concerned" Next in thread: GA12L@aol.com: "Re: where the continued pregnancy endangers the life of the woman concerned"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:43:12 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.