-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Gyn: LGSIL/HGSIL paps From: Elrod, Darryl G MAJ 48 MDOS/SGOBO (Darryl.elrod@LAKENHEATH.AF.MIL) Wed Mar 8 13:16:14 2006 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Henry Gregor: "O'Driscoll" Previous message: Richard Chudacoff, MD: "Re: LGSIL/HGSIL paps" Maybe in reply to: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Gyn: LGSIL/HGSIL paps" Next in thread: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Gyn: LGSIL/HGSIL paps" Reply: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Gyn: LGSIL/HGSIL paps" I agree with el, I'd just do a pap too. There is good reason to believe that in the healthy young women, it might have gotten better. Along those same lines, I saw a gal this week with all normal paps, one partner etc for what FP described as something odd on the cervix. What they saw was just a Nabothian cyst, but what I saw with the colposcope was diffuse acetowhite. Last pap was last month and was read as normal. Would anyone biopsy? Glen //SIGNED// D. Glen Elrod, Maj., USAF, MC Obstetrician/Gynecologist Chief of Obstetrics 48 MDOS/SGOBO RAF Lakenheath, England Telephone DSN: 314-226-8130 Comm: +44 (0) 1638 52 8130 Notice of Confidentiality Under the Privacy Act of 1974, you must safeguard all information reflected on this e-mail and, if applicable, all attachments. Disclosure of information is IAW AFI 33-119, AFI 33-127, AFI 37-131, AFI 37-132, AFI 33-219, and PL 93-579" This e-mail message including any attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Any questions pertaining to disclosure should be directed to the privacy officer. -----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Dr Eberhard Lisse Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 8:09 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Gyn: LGSIL/HGSIL paps I'd do a PAP. And take it from there. el on 3/8/06 10:06 PM doctorjoe@aol.com said the following: > If there's a colpo readily accessible, why not just "go for it." > > I was always happy to think of a colposcopy as sort of an extension of > the physical exam, just like the urologist who weilds a cysto or a > surgeon with a procto. Quick and relatively definitive. > > Joe P. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Garry E. Siegel, M.D. <garrys@mindspring.com> > To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net> > Sent: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 13:55:31 -0600 > Subject: Gyn: LGSIL/HGSIL paps > > Not too infrequently, I'll see someone who has not followed up on an > LSGIL or HGSIL pap from 6 to 12 months ago. Typically, this might be > someone who had an LGSIL pap in pregnancy, a colposcopy (with or without > biopsy)c/w mild dysplasia, who misses her 6 week pap, and now it is a > year/18 months later. > > Would you: > > 1. Pap now > 2. Colpo and pap now > 3. Pap/HPV now > 4. Other > > Garry > > -- > Garry E. Siegel, M.D. > Private Practice > Roswell, GA Next message: Henry Gregor: "O'Driscoll" Previous message: Richard Chudacoff, MD: "Re: LGSIL/HGSIL paps" Maybe in reply to: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Gyn: LGSIL/HGSIL paps" Next in thread: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Gyn: LGSIL/HGSIL paps" Reply: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Gyn: LGSIL/HGSIL paps"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 04:49:51 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.