OB-GYN-L Messages for February, 2006

OB-GYN-L Messages for February, 2006 by author

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]
Return to archive index

Starting: Wed Feb 1 12:23:19 2006
Ending: Tue Feb 28 21:33:29 2006
Messages: 1224

ainsron

Re: Prolapsed cord Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:07:28 -0800

Re: Fundal Pressure Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:53:38 -0800

Re: Checking cervices at term Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:37:00 -0800

Re: Operative Notes Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:01:58 -0800

Re: Prolapsed cord Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:54:09 -0800

Re: Norplant Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:51:43 -0800

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:21:08 -0800

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:51:07 -0800

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:21:28 -0800

Anna Meenan, MD

Re: Fundal Pressure Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:45:43 -0600 (CST)

Re: so-called abortion pill Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:31:44 -0600 (CST)

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:07:00 -0600 (CST)

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:55:57 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:12:25 -0600 (CST)

Re: Legal opinion needed Sat, 25 Feb 2006 23:04:53 -0600 (CST)

Re: Spanking babies Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:30:03 -0600 (CST)

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:25:09 -0600 (CST)

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:17:27 -0600 (CST)

Re: Contract Law Found to Govern Disposition of Frozen Embryos in Divorce Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:09:23 -0600 (CST)

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on 'Lay' Midwifery Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:07:00 -0600 (CST)

Re: OB: No Candid Camera Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:30:18 -0600 (CST)

Re: Verdict drives physician into bankruptcy Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:54:13 -0600 (CST)

Re: Womens' rights Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:56:09 -0600 (CST)

Re: HUMOR: Ladies Room Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:54:23 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:38:50 -0600 (CST)

Re: Patient responsiblility--the followup Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:37:08 -0600 (CST)

Patient responsiblility--the followup Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:03:49 -0600 (CST)

Re: FEMA Trailer Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:59:03 -0600 (CST)

Re: Music in the OR Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:05:33 -0600 (CST)

Re: Off Subj - Winter Olympics Wed, 8 Feb 2006 18:03:57 -0600 (CST)

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sat, 4 Feb 2006 09:38:40 -0600 (CST)

Re: Breastfeeding in the States Sat, 4 Feb 2006 01:52:32 -0600 (CST)

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sat, 4 Feb 2006 01:42:27 -0600 (CST)

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sat, 4 Feb 2006 01:32:18 -0600 (CST)

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sat, 4 Feb 2006 01:29:10 -0600 (CST)

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sat, 4 Feb 2006 01:20:39 -0600 (CST)

art fougner, md

OB: Fetal Pulse Oximetry No Help Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:14:05 -0600 (CST)

Re: Echinococcal cyst in pregnancy Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:49:34 -0600 (CST)

Re: Subject: Re:Embryo adoption was Contract Law Found to Govern Disposition of Frozen Embryos in Divorce Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:23:35 -0600 (CST)

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:33:06 -0600 (CST)

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:22:43 -0600 (CST)

Re: Contract Law Found to Govern Disposition of Frozen Embryos in Divorce Mon, 27 Feb 2006 09:16:52 -0600 (CST)

Gen: The Death of the Canadian Model Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:02:18 -0600 (CST)

Re: Contract Law Found to Govern Disposition of Frozen Embryos in Divorce Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:00:44 -0600 (CST)

Re: Legal opinion needed Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:11:10 -0600 (CST)

Re: Legal opinion needed Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:04:05 -0600 (CST)

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:48:35 -0600 (CST)

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:25:02 -0600 (CST)

Re: Gen: SD Senate Passes Abortion Ban Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:23:09 -0600 (CST)

Re: Contract Law Found to Govern Disposition of Frozen Embryos in Divorce Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:20:34 -0600 (CST)

Gen: SD Senate Passes Abortion Ban Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:30:06 -0600 (CST)

Re: Prolapsed cord-->language Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:48:08 -0600 (CST)

Re: ACOG Board reverses sanctions against two expert witnesses Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:46:59 -0600 (CST)

Re: Prolapsed cord Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:22:22 -0600 (CST)

Re: 2/06 ACOG statement regarding midwifery Wed, 22 Feb 2006 06:47:50 -0600 (CST)

Re: If You Are Wondering Why ... Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:52:46 -0600 (CST)

Re: Verdict drives physician into bankruptcy Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:10:35 -0600 (CST)

OB: No Candid Camera Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:58:58 -0600 (CST)

Re: Cheney Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:51:25 -0600 (CST)

Re: Cheney Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:18:58 -0600 (CST)

Re: A license to kill Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:36:29 -0600 (CST)

Re: CA 125 of 103 Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:35:50 -0600 (CST)

Re: CA 125 of 103 Sat, 11 Feb 2006 17:09:03 -0600 (CST)

Re: Anhydramnion Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:12:59 -0600 (CST)

Re: Anhydramnion Thu, 9 Feb 2006 14:09:25 -0600 (CST)

Re: CA 125 of 103 Thu, 9 Feb 2006 07:05:39 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:39:26 -0600 (CST)

Re: Anhydramnion Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:36:46 -0600 (CST)

Re: OPD management? Tue, 7 Feb 2006 12:33:42 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Tue, 7 Feb 2006 12:32:31 -0600 (CST)

Re: Cervical length Tue, 7 Feb 2006 06:47:23 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Tue, 7 Feb 2006 06:45:13 -0600 (CST)

Re: SuperBowl Tue, 7 Feb 2006 06:43:11 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Mon, 6 Feb 2006 14:38:41 -0600 (CST)

Re: Helping MDs survive billing cycle Mon, 6 Feb 2006 14:37:29 -0600 (CST)

Re: Scope of practice Mon, 6 Feb 2006 09:00:17 -0600 (CST)

Bülent Potur

Re: Anhydramnion Thu, 9 Feb 2006 07:32:44 +0200

babycatchers@aol.com

Re: Ortho Evra Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:13:25 -0500

allergy shots Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:03:19 -0500

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on 'Lay' Midwifery - Long response Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:40:21 EST

Re: FasterTort Reform Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:02:58 -0500

Barbara Nicol MD

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:00:10 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:01:42 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:36:25 -0600 (CST)

BB Javier MD

Re: OB-GYN-L digest 4579 !STAMP:060214230450:5191| Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:04:54 +0800

Re: OB-GYN-L digest 4578 !STAMP:060214230254:5170| Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:03:33 +0800

Bernard Cristalli

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 14:31:47 +0100

Re: Sad but true (long) Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:04:20 +0100

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:48:56 +0100

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:44:36 +0100

Re: CA 125 of 103 Thu, 09 Feb 2006 09:07:02 +0100

Re: SuperBowl Sun, 05 Feb 2006 22:19:46 +0100

Betsy Hyde

Re: Question from a friend of mine Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:41:32 -0500

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:37:37 -0500

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:42:26 -0500

Charlie Chambers

Re: HUMOR: Ladies Room Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:39:58 -0800

Re: Norplant Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:23:08 -0800

Re: Norplant Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:00:00 -0800

Re: Sad but true Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:52:00 -0800

Re: Sad but true Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:22:03 -0800

Re: Sad but true Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:49:27 -0800

Re: Sad but true Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:10:48 -0800

Re: Bladder and Bowel Question Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:57:14 -0800

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:20:36 -0800

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Thu, 9 Feb 2006 15:57:40 -0800

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Tue, 7 Feb 2006 18:42:33 -0800

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Tue, 7 Feb 2006 18:08:39 -0800

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Tue, 7 Feb 2006 11:34:21 -0800

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:42:01 -0800

Re: Cervical length Mon, 6 Feb 2006 21:07:26 -0800

Re: OPD management? Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:29:15 -0800

Re: SuperBowl Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:48:51 -0800

Re: Preeclampsia Solved Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:25:27 -0800

Re: Preeclampsia Solved Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:24:12 -0800

Re: Endometrial ablation Wed, 1 Feb 2006 14:26:43 -0800

chellaram@pol.net

Re: bantering and name calling Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:33:04 -0500 (EST)

Cheri Van Hoover

Re: Question from a friend of mine Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:39:03 -0800

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:20:44 -0800

Chlamydia Screening Sun, 26 Feb 2006 10:03:30 -0800

Re: Legal opinion needed Sat, 25 Feb 2006 08:06:00 -0800

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on 'Lay' Midwifery Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:31:13 -0800

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on "Lay" Midwifery - Long response Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:55:44 -0800

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on 'Lay' Midwifery - Long response Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:44:44 -0800

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on 'Lay' Midwifery - Long response Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:38:27 -0800

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on 'Lay' Midwifery - Long response Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:34:01 -0800

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:53:38 -0800

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sat, 04 Feb 2006 22:25:14 -0800

Re: CNM Prescriptive Authority Fri, 03 Feb 2006 14:22:37 -0800

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 03 Feb 2006 14:12:42 -0800

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:29:32 -0800

claire

Re: Spanking babies Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:27:00 -0600 (CST)

claire constable

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Thu, 9 Feb 2006 13:14:54 -0600 (CST)

D. Ashley Hill

Re: Fundal Pressure Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:49:53 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:26:37 -0600 (CST)

Re: Prolapsed cord Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:58:56 -0600 (CST)

Re: Message for Dr D. Ashley Hill Tue, 21 Feb 2006 19:39:15 -0600 (CST)

Re: bantering and name calling Sat, 18 Feb 2006 06:52:43 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:41:06 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:45:33 -0600 (CST)

Re: OB: No Candid Camera Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:27:57 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:11:44 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:06:26 -0600 (CST)

Re: OB: First trimester medical management of missed Ab Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:02:42 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:20:23 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:09:17 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:08:51 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:34:53 -0600 (CST)

Re: Anhydramnion Wed, 8 Feb 2006 22:46:21 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Wed, 8 Feb 2006 18:21:53 -0600 (CST)

Re: Anhydramnion Wed, 8 Feb 2006 18:16:59 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:27:49 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Mon, 6 Feb 2006 19:02:53 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Mon, 6 Feb 2006 10:48:06 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Mon, 6 Feb 2006 07:41:14 -0600 (CST)

VBAC immediately available policy Mon, 6 Feb 2006 07:16:24 -0600 (CST)

Re: Breastfeeding in the States Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:54:13 -0600 (CST)

David Priver

Re: Gen: SD Senate Passes Abortion Ban Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:31:18 -0600 (CST)

Re: ACOG Board reverses sanctions against two expert witnesses Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:00:54 -0600 (CST)

ACOG Board reverses sanctions against two expert witnesses Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:08:04 -0600 (CST)

Dean Huffman

My apologies if I offend anyone but I thought this was funny Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:42:02 -0700

Dean Huffman .

Re: Subject: Re:Embryo adoption was Contract Law Found to Govern Disposition of Frozen Embryos in Divorce Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:19:30 -0700

OT, But Important: When Google Might NOT Be Your Friend Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:52:03 -0700

OT: News headlines Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:11:51 -0700

Re: Contract Law Found to Govern Disposition of Frozen Embryos in Divorce Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:01:15 -0700

OT/Fri Humor: Everybody Likes To Be Liked Sun, 26 Feb 2006 10:42:39 -0700

Contract Law Found to Govern Disposition of Frozen Embryos in Divorce Fri, 24 Feb 2006 06:49:04 -0700

If You Are Wondering Why ... Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:44:32 -0700

Study On Use Safety Of Ce11 Phones In Hospitals Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:29:16 -0700

OT: Dead Judges Voting -- When Does Life Tenure End? Tue, 21 Feb 2006 06:55:17 -0700

Verdict drives physician into bankruptcy Sun, 19 Feb 2006 17:44:36 -0700

Jury Clears Merck in First Federal Vioxx Case Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:52:03 -0700

Re: Norplant Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:25:51 -0700

Re: OB: No Candid Camera Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:25:36 -0700

Dick Cheney Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:50:09 -0700

FRI Humor: Weapons Of Mass Destruction Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:14:55 -0700

Pathetically True Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:44:03 -0700

Re: Jury duty Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:58:31 -0700

Dennis Wieck,MD

ABC Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:45:10 -0600 (CST)

DMECNM@aol.com

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:29:48 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:00:08 EST

Spanking babies Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:18:23 -0500

Re: SuperBowl Tue, 07 Feb 2006 11:39:41 -0500

DoctorJoe@aol.com

Re: Subject: Re:Embryo adoption was Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:42:38 EST

Re: Gyn: Our friends, the ureters Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:12:41 EST

Re: Subject: Re:Embryo adoption was Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:10:56 EST

Re: Gyn: Our friends, the ureters Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:43:33 EST

Re: Question from a friend of mine Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:26:34 -0500

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:54:01 -0500

Re: Gen: The Death of the Canadian Model Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:46:03 EST

Re: Contract Law Found to Govern Disposition of Frozen Embryos in Divorce Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:44:50 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:42:29 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:41:31 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:40:48 EST

Re: Chlamydia Screening Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:31:11 EST

Re: Chlamydia Screening Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:30:14 EST

Re: Contract Law Found to Govern Disposition of Frozen Embryos in Divorce Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:29:36 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:27:51 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:29:58 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sat, 25 Feb 2006 21:49:32 EST

Re: Legal opinion needed Sat, 25 Feb 2006 12:07:43 EST

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:12:29 EST

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:11:50 EST

Re: Gen: SD Senate Passes Abortion Ban Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:05:41 -0500

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:06:08 -0500

Re: Contract Law Found to Govern Disposition of Frozen Embryos in Divorce Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:48:43 -0500

Re: Operative Notes Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:00:39 EST

Re: Prolapsed cord Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:58:38 EST

Re: Gen: SD Senate Passes Abortion Ban Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:15:18 EST

Re: Prolapsed cord-->language Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:12:32 EST

Re: ACOG Board reverses sanctions against two expert witnesses Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:09:49 EST

Re: Gen: SD Senate Passes Abortion Ban Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:07:17 EST

Re: Prolapsed cord-->language Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:54:39 -0500

Re: ACOG Board reverses sanctions against two expert witnesses Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:52:07 -0500

Re: Prolapsed cord-->language Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:21:11 -0500

Re: FRI 2/06 ACOG Statement on 'Lay' Midwifery Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:10:38 -0500

Re: Prolapsed cord Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:29:32 EST

Re: Prolapsed cord Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:28:25 EST

Re: Gerald & el Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:22:30 EST

Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: rmodugno@aol.com Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:15:07 EST

FRI Cartoons? Wed, 22 Feb 2006 08:44:06 EST

Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: rmodugno@aol.com Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:30:21 EST

Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: rmodugno@aol.com Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:29:01 EST

Re: OT: Dead Judges Voting -- When Does Life Tenure End? Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:07:40 EST

Re: OB: No Candid Camera Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:02:00 EST

Re: FRI Verdict drives physician into bankruptcy Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:53:10 EST

Re: Verdict drives physician into bankruptcy Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:19:47 -0500

Re: Womens' rights Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:28:26 EST

Re: HUMOR: Ladies Room Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:25:11 EST

FRI Tort Reform is on the way! Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:22:56 EST

Re: HUMOR: Ladies Room Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:18:45 EST

Re: FRI & OB Post maturity Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:58:55 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:22:20 -0500

Re: OB: No Candid Camera Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:40:03 -0500

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:55:00 -0500

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:52:06 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:00:26 -0500

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:46:52 -0500

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:18:53 -0500

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:48:33 -0500

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:44:22 -0500

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:25:05 -0500

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:23:53 EST

Re: Patient responsiblility--the followup Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:12:21 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:09:19 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:07:04 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:55:37 EST

Re: Sad but true Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:17:39 EST

Re: Cheney Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:42:38 EST

Re: Music in the OR Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:44:22 EST

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:40:14 EST

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:17:59 -0500

Re: Bladder and Bowel Question Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:37:11 -0500

Re: 'nuther one Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:09:18 -0500

Re: Music in the OR Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:43:41 EST

Re: Music in the OR Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:42:45 EST

Re: FEMA Trailer Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:41:44 EST

Re: Music in the OR Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:41:21 EST

Re: viewing Jury duty Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:12:22 EST

Re: Ina May Gaskin/Quilt (long) Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:23:50 EST

Re: Off Subj - Winter Olympics Wed, 8 Feb 2006 08:29:45 EST

Re: OPD management? Tue, 07 Feb 2006 16:01:27 -0500

Re: FRI Caveman Tue, 07 Feb 2006 14:13:36 -0500

Re: SuperBowl Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:56:52 EST

Re: OPD management? Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:52:49 EST

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Mon, 6 Feb 2006 23:24:00 EST

Re: SuperBowl Mon, 6 Feb 2006 08:15:59 EST

Re: SuperBowl Mon, 6 Feb 2006 08:15:17 EST

Re: Now it's McCarthy Mon, 6 Feb 2006 08:12:04 EST

Re: FRI SuperBowl Sun, 5 Feb 2006 10:36:53 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 10:34:49 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 10:33:19 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 03 Feb 2006 15:32:31 -0500

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Thu, 2 Feb 2006 23:09:14 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:37:14 EST

Dr Eberhard Lisse

Re: Fundal Pressure Wed, 01 Mar 2006 06:32:59 +0200

Re: Echinococcal cyst in pregnancy Wed, 01 Mar 2006 06:22:59 +0200

Re: Prolapsed cord Wed, 01 Mar 2006 06:00:48 +0200

Re: Fundal Pressure Wed, 01 Mar 2006 05:52:08 +0200

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:10:57 +0200

Re: Checking cervices at term Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:19:04 +0200

Re: Checking cervices at term Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:16:26 +0200

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 23:19:47 +0200

Re: Checking cervices at term Mon, 27 Feb 2006 23:13:57 +0200

Re: Gyn: Cervical Cytology Sun, 26 Feb 2006 22:51:15 +0200

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 20:15:05 +0200

Re: Legal opinion needed Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:54:03 +0200

Re: Legal opinion needed Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:05:37 +0200

Re: Operative Notes Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:52:19 +0200

Re: Legal opinion needed Sat, 25 Feb 2006 07:45:11 +0200

Re: Legal opinion needed Sat, 25 Feb 2006 07:04:51 +0200

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:47:12 +0200

Re: Caveman and me Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:17:27 +0200

Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: rmodugno@aol.com Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:39:23 +0200

Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: rmodugno@aol.com Thu, 23 Feb 2006 06:28:14 +0200

Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: rmodugno@aol.com Thu, 23 Feb 2006 05:59:25 +0200

Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: rmodugno@aol.com Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:22:57 +0200

Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: rmodugno@aol.com Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:37:59 +0200

Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: rmodugno@aol.com Wed, 22 Feb 2006 07:33:43 +0200

Re: bantering and name calling Tue, 21 Feb 2006 05:51:26 +0200

Re: OB: First trimester medical management of missed Ab Mon, 20 Feb 2006 06:07:35 +0200

Re: HUMOR: Ladies Room Mon, 20 Feb 2006 06:02:48 +0200

Re: bantering and name calling Mon, 20 Feb 2006 05:49:38 +0200

Re: Womens' rights Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:29:18 +0200

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Sat, 18 Feb 2006 07:46:26 +0200

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Sat, 18 Feb 2006 07:01:13 +0200

Re: Followup on the weather Sat, 18 Feb 2006 06:57:59 +0200

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Sat, 18 Feb 2006 06:54:59 +0200

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Sat, 18 Feb 2006 06:52:27 +0200

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:41:43 +0200

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:35:40 +0200

Re: Fwd: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:30:34 +0200

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:18:40 +0200

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:11:37 +0200

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:09:26 +0200

Re: Sad but true Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:26:54 +0200

Re: Norplant Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:21:31 +0200

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:13:29 +0200

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:11:52 +0200

Re: Cheney Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:41:24 +0200

Re: Patient responsiblility--the followup Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:08:35 +0200

Re: FRI Humor: Weapons Of Mass Destruction Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:09:19 +0200

Re: Cheney Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:02:51 +0200

Re: Sad but true Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:00:19 +0200

Re: Sad but true Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:58:58 +0200

Re: call service Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:53:36 +0200

Re: Subject: Re: Sad but true (long) Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:39:39 +0200

Re: Subject: Re: Sad but true (long) Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:32:47 +0200

Call Service Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:44:06 +0200

Re: 'nuther one Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:28:03 +0200

Re: FRI Humor: Weapons Of Mass Destruction Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:06:34 +0200

Re: Sad but true (long) Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:04:17 +0200

'nuther one Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:41:08 +0200

Re: Music in the OR Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:26:37 +0200

Re: Music in the OR Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:22:36 +0200

Re: FEMA Trailer Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:21:39 +0200

Re: Music in the OR Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:20:46 +0200

Re: Music in the OR Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:18:10 +0200

Re: Music in the OR Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:55:38 +0200

Re: Music in the OR Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:21:56 +0200

Re: FEMA Trailer Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:03:09 +0200

Re: Music in the OR Tue, 14 Feb 2006 05:55:32 +0200

Re: Initials Tue, 14 Feb 2006 05:53:05 +0200

Re: Initials Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:18:30 +0200

Re: Initials Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:30:40 +0200

Re: Initials Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:29:47 +0200

Re: Initials Mon, 13 Feb 2006 06:05:55 +0200

Re: Ina May Gaskin/Quilt (long) Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:22:23 +0200

Followup Anhydramnion Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:40:51 +0200

Re: Anhydramnion Fri, 10 Feb 2006 23:18:00 +0200

Re: A fuzzy behind Fri, 10 Feb 2006 23:05:56 +0200

Re: Love that name Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:30:27 +0200

Re: Love that name Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:48:49 +0200

Re: Anhydramnion Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:12:09 +0200

Re: Anhydramnion Thu, 09 Feb 2006 20:32:14 +0200

Re: Ina May Gaskin/Quilt Thu, 09 Feb 2006 20:22:20 +0200

Re: Anhydramnion Thu, 09 Feb 2006 07:51:13 +0200

Re: Anhydramnion Thu, 09 Feb 2006 06:07:53 +0200

Re: CA 125 of 103 Thu, 09 Feb 2006 06:03:59 +0200

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Thu, 09 Feb 2006 05:48:00 +0200

Anhydramnion Thu, 09 Feb 2006 00:05:06 +0200

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Wed, 08 Feb 2006 06:55:46 +0200

Re: Did I write that? Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:03:49 +0200

Re: Did I write that? Tue, 07 Feb 2006 20:40:49 +0200

Re: OPD management? Tue, 07 Feb 2006 20:39:43 +0200

Re: Did I write that? Tue, 07 Feb 2006 17:48:27 +0200

Re: Did I write that? Tue, 07 Feb 2006 17:28:32 +0200

Re: SuperBowl Tue, 07 Feb 2006 07:28:34 +0200

Re: Cervical length Tue, 07 Feb 2006 07:10:47 +0200

Re: Did I write that? Tue, 07 Feb 2006 07:08:46 +0200

Re: Scope of practice Tue, 07 Feb 2006 06:36:06 +0200

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Tue, 07 Feb 2006 06:16:43 +0200

Re: Scope of practice Tue, 07 Feb 2006 06:14:41 +0200

Re: Scope of practice Tue, 07 Feb 2006 06:08:43 +0200

Re: Scope of practice Tue, 07 Feb 2006 05:55:22 +0200

Re: Scope of practice Mon, 06 Feb 2006 21:44:54 +0200

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved (long) Mon, 06 Feb 2006 14:25:51 +0200

Scope of practice Mon, 06 Feb 2006 14:10:00 +0200

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Mon, 06 Feb 2006 05:56:34 +0200

Re: UK training of midwives Mon, 06 Feb 2006 00:56:18 +0200

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Mon, 06 Feb 2006 00:31:46 +0200

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Mon, 06 Feb 2006 00:12:48 +0200

Re: SuperBowl Mon, 06 Feb 2006 00:10:31 +0200

Re: SuperBowl Mon, 06 Feb 2006 00:08:36 +0200

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 05 Feb 2006 19:42:18 +0200

Re: SuperBowl Sun, 05 Feb 2006 19:37:27 +0200

Re: SuperBowl Sun, 05 Feb 2006 19:35:15 +0200

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 05 Feb 2006 18:35:33 +0200

Re: FRI SuperBowl Sun, 05 Feb 2006 18:09:45 +0200

Now it's McCarthy Sun, 05 Feb 2006 18:07:09 +0200

SuperBowl Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:26:51 +0200

Re: Breastfeeding in the States Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:01:38 +0200

Dr Ron Jewell

POP-Q recording Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:37:18 -0600 (CST)

Dr. Ainsworth

Fundal Pressure Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:13:54 -0600 (CST)

Dr. John Provatopoulos B.Sc. M.D.C.M. F.R.S.C.

Re: Fundal Pressure Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:21:26 -0600 (CST)

Re: Gyn: Our friends, the ureters Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:55:41 -0600 (CST)

Re: Checking cervices at term Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:19:56 -0600 (CST)

Re: Post maturity Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:47:23 -0600 (CST)

Re: OB: First trimester medical management of missed Ab Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:12:06 -0600 (CST)

Re: CA 125 of 103 Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:07:01 -0600 (CST)

Re: CA 125 of 103 Sun, 12 Feb 2006 06:59:33 -0600 (CST)

Re: CA 125 of 103 Sun, 12 Feb 2006 06:13:41 -0600 (CST)

Re: CA 125 of 103 Sun, 12 Feb 2006 06:03:39 -0600 (CST)

Re: CA 125 of 103 Fri, 10 Feb 2006 07:43:38 -0600 (CST)

Re: Anhydramnion Thu, 9 Feb 2006 04:54:36 -0600 (CST)

Re: Anhydramnion Wed, 8 Feb 2006 20:14:37 -0600 (CST)

Re: Anhydramnion Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:37:50 -0600 (CST)

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:42:30 -0600 (CST)

Re: Preeclampsia Solved Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:17:17 -0600 (CST)

Efrain Ramirez

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:15:51 -0600 (CST)

Re: Question from a friend of mine Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:57:27 -0600 (CST)

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:49:47 -0600 (CST)

Re: Checking cervices at term Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:47:00 -0600 (CST)

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:36:29 -0600 (CST)

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:54:11 -0600 (CST)

Rates of Cesarean Delivery Among Puerto Rican Women Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:53:08 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 05:57:21 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:45:28 -0600 (CST)

Re: Prolapsed cord Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:01:40 -0600 (CST)

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on 'Lay' Midwifery - Long response Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:22:00 -0600 (CST)

Re: site speed Sun, 19 Feb 2006 13:46:18 -0600 (CST)

Re: Post maturity Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:24:50 -0600 (CST)

Re: Post maturity Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:24:28 -0600 (CST)

Re: bantering and name calling Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:09:07 -0600 (CST)

Re: bantering and name calling Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:06:24 -0600 (CST)

Re: site speed Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:52:41 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:42:38 -0600 (CST)

Re: OB: No Candid Camera Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:07:51 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:17:12 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:01:40 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:23:05 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:11:34 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:43:13 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true (long) Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:47:40 -0600 (CST)

Re: 'nuther one Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:28:49 -0600 (CST)

Re: Anhydramnion Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:25:59 -0600 (CST)

Re: scope of practice Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:01:31 -0600 (CST)

Re: CA 125 of 103 Fri, 10 Feb 2006 05:54:47 -0600 (CST)

Re: Anhydramnion Fri, 10 Feb 2006 05:50:08 -0600 (CST)

Re: Anhydramnion Wed, 8 Feb 2006 16:15:57 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Wed, 8 Feb 2006 15:54:26 -0600 (CST)

Re: OPD management? Wed, 8 Feb 2006 15:31:28 -0600 (CST)

Re: OPD management? Mon, 6 Feb 2006 22:44:55 -0600 (CST)

Re: OPD management? Mon, 6 Feb 2006 21:58:30 -0600 (CST)

Re: Scope of practice Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:58:37 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:54:45 -0600 (CST)

Re: Scope of practice Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:48:55 -0600 (CST)

Re: Scope of practice Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:38:48 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:36:12 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:33:45 -0600 (CST)

Re: Scope of practice Mon, 6 Feb 2006 17:24:01 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Mon, 6 Feb 2006 17:13:39 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:42:30 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Mon, 6 Feb 2006 07:29:33 -0600 (CST)

OPD management? Mon, 6 Feb 2006 06:51:03 -0600 (CST)

Re: SuperBowl Mon, 6 Feb 2006 06:41:31 -0600 (CST)

Re: Now it's McCarthy Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:42:49 -0600 (CST)

Re: Midwifery training was Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:34:04 -0600 (CST)

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 07:30:04 -0600 (CST)

Re: Preeclampsia Solved-long Sat, 4 Feb 2006 17:26:00 -0600 (CST)

Re: Preeclampsia Solved Sat, 4 Feb 2006 13:16:27 -0600 (CST)

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sat, 4 Feb 2006 05:11:45 -0600 (CST)

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:08:24 -0600 (CST)

Elrod, Darryl G MAJ 48 MDOS/SGOBO

Re: Fetal Pulse Oximetry No Help Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:45:45 -0000

Re: Echinococcal cyst in pregnancy Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:42:46 -0000

Re: Fundal Pressure Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:31:41 -0000

Re: Echinococcal cyst in pregnancy Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:24:02 -0000

Echinococcal cyst in pregnancy Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:29:08 -0000

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:45:15 -0000

Re: Legal opinion needed Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:31:58 -0000

Re: Legal opinion needed Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:33:37 -0000

Re: Operative Notes Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:26:31 -0000

Re: Operative Notes Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:46:33 -0000

Message for Dr D. Ashley Hill Tue, 21 Feb 2006 14:11:52 -0000

Re: Music in the OR Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:05:53 -0000

Re: Music in the OR Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:28:30 -0000

Tuscon, Arizona Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:21:47 -0000

Re: CA 125 of 103 Thu, 9 Feb 2006 10:47:05 -0000

Re: SuperBowl Tue, 7 Feb 2006 09:48:41 -0000

ENDODOK@aol.com

Re: Tuscon, Arizona Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:54:01 EST

Re: Endometrial ablation Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:00:05 EST

fran wilson

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Mon, 27 Feb 2006 23:37:55 -0800

Re: Question from a friend of mine Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:09:09 -0800

Re: Question from a friend of mine Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:56:32 -0800

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:46:58 -0800

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:06:45 -0800

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 05:13:29 -0800

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on 'Lay' Midwifery Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:56:45 -0800

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on "Lay" Midwifery Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:08:01 -0800

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on "Lay" Midwifery - Long response Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:54:51 -0800

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on "Lay" Midwifery - Long response Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:26:47 -0800

Re: Norplant Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:23:15 -0800

Re: Norplant Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:59:05 -0800

Condom size Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:05:23 -0800

Re: Sad but true Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:57:08 -0800

Norplant Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:13:48 -0800

Re: Sad but true Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:03:40 -0800

Re: Sad but true Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:40:32 -0800

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Thu, 09 Feb 2006 20:43:31 -0800

Re: Off Subj - Winter Olympics Wed, 08 Feb 2006 10:37:53 -0800

Re: SuperBowl Tue, 07 Feb 2006 13:08:09 -0800

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sat, 04 Feb 2006 07:55:36 -0800

GA12L@aol.com

Re: Gyn: Our friends, the ureters Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:31:44 EST

Re: Checking cervices at term Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:21:53 EST

Re: Echinococcal cyst in pregnancy Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:16:47 EST

Re: Fundal Pressure Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:07:44 EST

Re: Echinococcal cyst in pregnancy Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:58:05 EST

Re: Checking cervices at term Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:46:57 EST

Re: Gyn: Our friends, the ureters Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:36:52 EST

Re: Ortho Evra Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:29:15 EST

Re: Gyn: Our friends, the ureters Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:21:38 EST

Re: Ortho Evra Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:08:35 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:45:20 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:35:37 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:17:10 EST

Re: Ponit taken Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:05:15 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:03:32 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:54:32 EST

Re: Checking cervices at term Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:50:33 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:47:07 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:44:38 EST

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:31:28 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:29:26 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:17:45 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:12:55 EST

Re: Checking cervices at term Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:44:33 EST

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:04:46 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:02:20 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:59:20 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:58:31 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:45:11 EST

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:36:03 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:31:33 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:26:01 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:21:52 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:07:10 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:00:38 EST

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:08:10 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:03:58 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:02:01 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:59:50 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:36:03 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 09:38:37 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:04:18 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:02:45 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:01:43 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:36:04 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:32:26 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:36:59 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:29:52 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:49:07 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:44:08 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:41:12 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:10:28 EST

Re: Cervical screening Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:07:22 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:08:36 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:08:17 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 07:56:35 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:16:55 EST

Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:45:52 EST

Re: Legal opinion needed Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:33:46 EST

Re: Legal opinion needed Sat, 25 Feb 2006 08:16:28 EST

Re: Legal opinion needed Sat, 25 Feb 2006 08:00:52 EST

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on 'Lay' Midwifery Sat, 25 Feb 2006 07:23:29 EST

Re: Spanking babies Sat, 25 Feb 2006 07:21:13 EST

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:39:55 EST

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:02:07 EST

Re: Contract Law Found to Govern Disposition of Frozen Embryos in Divorce Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:04:19 EST

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:01:20 EST

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:23:48 EST

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on "Lay" Midwifery Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:23:42 EST

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:23:55 EST

Re: Remove my name Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:23:24 EST

Re: refutation Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:35:16 EST

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on "Lay" Midwifery Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:27:33 EST

Re: Caveman and me Thu, 23 Feb 2006 06:09:13 EST

Re: refutation Thu, 23 Feb 2006 06:06:59 EST

FOR HOLLY. Apologies to everyone else Wed, 22 Feb 2006 07:38:24 EST

Re: For Gail Tue, 21 Feb 2006 18:26:52 EST

Re: For Gail Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:27:35 EST

Re: bantering and name calling Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:40:48 EST

Re: bantering and name calling Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:44:01 EST

Re: HUMOR: Ladies Room Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:04:33 EST

Re: Womens' rights Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:02:30 EST

Re: Roadster Sun, 19 Feb 2006 19:32:32 EST

Re: HUMOR: Ladies Room Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:38:10 EST

Re: HUMOR: Ladies Room Sun, 19 Feb 2006 17:22:56 EST

Re: Post maturity Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:39:53 EST

Re: FRI & OB Post maturity Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:52:31 EST

Re: Post maturity Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:58:07 EST

Re: Norplant Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:46:51 EST

Post maturity Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:31:11 EST

My apologies if I offend anyone but I thought bthis was funny Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:31:04 EST

Re: bantering and name calling Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:28:55 EST

Re: bantering and name calling Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:00:07 EST

Re: Four expectant fathers Sat, 18 Feb 2006 06:02:38 EST

bantering and name calling Sat, 18 Feb 2006 05:53:32 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Sat, 18 Feb 2006 05:17:14 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:43:13 EST

Re: Friday Humor Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:15:35 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:47:50 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:41:56 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:59:58 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:57:23 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:46:50 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:58:02 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:29:09 EST

Re: Sad but true Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:08:49 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:06:19 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:47:59 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:53:34 EST

Re: Sad but true Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:09:15 EST

Re: Sad but true Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:29:41 EST

Re: FRI Humor: Weapons Of Mass Destruction Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:26:42 EST

Re: Sad but true Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:06:41 EST

Re: Sad but true Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:48:11 EST

Re: Music in the OR Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:54:52 EST

Re: FRI Humor: Weapons Of Mass Destruction Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:51:47 EST

Re: Music in the OR Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:41:47 EST

Re: Subject: Re: Sad but true (long) Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:57:17 EST

Re: Subject: Re: Sad but true (long) Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:06:45 EST

Re: Subject: Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:49:25 EST

Re: 'nuther one Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:17:56 EST

Re: Initials Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:15:55 EST

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Thu, 9 Feb 2006 14:59:14 EST

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:13:48 EST

Re: Off Subj - Winter Olympics Wed, 8 Feb 2006 07:49:32 EST

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Tue, 7 Feb 2006 18:13:05 EST

Re: OPD management? Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:42:12 EST

Re: OPD management? Tue, 7 Feb 2006 13:20:45 EST

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Tue, 7 Feb 2006 12:20:50 EST

Re: Scope of practice Mon, 6 Feb 2006 17:59:34 EST

Re: Scope of practice Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:33:49 EST

Re: Scope of practice Mon, 6 Feb 2006 10:37:33 EST

Re: UK training of midwives Mon, 6 Feb 2006 03:45:01 EST

Re: UK training of midwives Mon, 6 Feb 2006 03:40:43 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Mon, 6 Feb 2006 03:35:37 EST

Re: UK training of midwives Sun, 5 Feb 2006 20:00:26 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:12:25 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:04:30 EST

Re: UK training of midwives Sun, 5 Feb 2006 18:41:42 EST

Re: UK training of midwives Sun, 5 Feb 2006 17:00:38 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 01:17:26 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 01:12:27 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 01:04:10 EST

Re: Breastfeeding in the States Sun, 5 Feb 2006 00:52:19 EST

Re: Breastfeeding in the States Fri, 3 Feb 2006 21:25:26 EST

Re: CNM Prescriptive Authority Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:45:33 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:03:48 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:49:39 EST

Breastfeeding in the States Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:41:23 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:29:10 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:24:15 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:17:09 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:06:35 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:17:40 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:37:17 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:35:11 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:49:16 EST

Gail

Re: FOR HOLLY. Apologies to everyone else Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:50:32 -0600 (CST)

For Gail Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:50:24 -0600 (CST)

Garry E. Siegel, M.D.

Gen: Courtesy on the list Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:15:39 -0600 (CST)

Re: Fundal Pressure Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:07:42 -0600 (CST)

Re: Our friends, the ureters Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:00:58 -0600 (CST)

Re: Gyn: Our friends, the ureters Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:58:52 -0600 (CST)

Gyn: Ortho Evra Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:50:37 -0600 (CST)

Gyn: Our friends, the ureters Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:48:38 -0600 (CST)

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:45:36 -0600 (CST)

Re: Checking cervices at term Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:31:31 -0600 (CST)

Checking cervices at term Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:23:35 -0600 (CST)

Gyn: Cervical Cytology Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:00:37 -0600 (CST)

Gyn: Operative Notes Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:55:35 -0600 (CST)

Re: Prolapsed cord-->language Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:53:03 -0600 (CST)

Re: Prolapsed cord Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:17:02 -0600 (CST)

Re: OB: First trimester medical management of missed Ab**advice please Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:36:52 -0600 (CST)

Re: Norplant Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:09:02 -0600 (CST)

Re: OB: First trimester medical management of missed Ab Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:05:15 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:02:34 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:44:48 -0600 (CST)

Re: Gyn: Trachelectomy**surgery done Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:24:39 -0600 (CST)

Re: OB: First trimester medical management of missed Ab Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:20:51 -0600 (CST)

Re: OB: No Candid Camera Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:07:17 -0600 (CST)

Re: OB: No Candid Camera Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:05:16 -0600 (CST)

Re: OB: First trimester medical management of missed Ab Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:50:41 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Simple Math, too! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:49:22 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true (long) Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:00:45 -0600 (CST)

OB: First trimester medical management of missed Ab Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:21:49 -0600 (CST)

Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:25:49 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:50:29 -0600 (CST)

Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:47:57 -0600 (CST)

Re: Bladder and Bowel Question Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:35:26 -0600 (CST)

Re: Initials Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:50:41 -0600 (CST)

Re: CA 125 of 103 Wed, 8 Feb 2006 22:03:38 -0600 (CST)

Re: Cervical length/OPD management Tue, 7 Feb 2006 09:10:54 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:42:06 -0600 (CST)

Neonatal suction Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:35:38 -0600 (CST)

Re: Endometrial ablation Wed, 1 Feb 2006 17:38:18 -0600 (CST)

Garry Siegel

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:40:33 -0600 (CST)

Gerald P. Rodríguez

Re: Our friends, the ureters Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:04:17 -0700

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:18:06 -0700

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:34:16 -0700

Re: Cervix Cancer Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:35:43 -0700

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:00:45 -0700

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:26:06 -0700

Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: rmodugno@aol.com Thu, 23 Feb 2006 05:04:28 -0700

Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: rmodugno@aol.com Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:51:52 -0700

Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: rmodugno@aol.com Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:17:17 -0700

Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: rmodugno@aol.com Wed, 22 Feb 2006 08:06:30 -0700

Friday Humor Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:56:34 -0700

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:27:17 -0700

Re: Music in the OR Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:18:23 -0700

Re: Did I write that? Tue, 7 Feb 2006 07:49:45 -0700

Re: Breastfeeding in the States Sat, 4 Feb 2006 05:42:58 -0700

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 3 Feb 2006 08:56:08 -0700

GIN11153@aol.com

Question from a friend of mine Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:16:54 EST

article:Medical Protective lowers malpractice rates for Texas doctors Thu, 23 Feb 2006 02:19:07 EST

Four expectant fathers Sat, 18 Feb 2006 05:52:44 EST

Re: call service Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:43:20 EST

Ob-Gyn prevails in case alleging late detection of ovarian cancer Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:33:28 EST

Lax protocols blamed for delayed birth article-$11 million judgement Tue, 7 Feb 2006 02:26:01 EST

gjdiwpx@aol.com

Remove from list Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:57:39 -0500

Grace Loehr

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:46:12 -0500

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:28:47 -0500

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 04:53:08 -0500

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 01:47:54 -0500

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:10:09 -0500

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:06:26 -0500

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:36:06 -0500

Re: Legal opinion needed Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:09:40 -0500

Re: Prolapsed cord Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:54:33 -0500

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on "Lay" Midwifery Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:29:46 -0500

Re: Caveman and me Thu, 23 Feb 2006 06:47:40 -0500

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on "Lay" Midwifery - Long response Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:17:33 -0500

Re: Sad but true (long) Wed, 15 Feb 2006 05:53:57 -0500

Re: Scope of practice Mon, 6 Feb 2006 21:28:05 -0500

Scope of practice Mon, 6 Feb 2006 09:32:36 -0500

Re: UK training of midwives Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:37:22 -0500

Re: UK training of midwives Sun, 5 Feb 2006 18:43:25 -0500

Re: Neonatal suction Sun, 5 Feb 2006 15:07:04 -0500

Re: Midwifery training was Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 15:02:27 -0500

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 13:32:43 -0500

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:24:21 -0500

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 3 Feb 2006 07:18:51 -0500

hadagin

Re: FRI Humor: Weapons Of Mass Destruction Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:07:50 -0800 (PST)

Re: FRI Humor: Weapons Of Mass Destruction Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:07:50 -0800 (PST)

Re: FRI Humor: Weapons Of Mass Destruction Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:07:50 -0800 (PST)

Womens' rights Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:39:46 -0800 (PST)

Re: FRI Humor: Weapons Of Mass Destruction Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:34:06 -0800 (PST)

Re: Fwd: A license to kill Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:12:39 -0800 (PST)

Henry Gregor

hugging ureters Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:00:44 -0800 (PST)

Ponit taken Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:36:23 -0800 (PST)

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:05:10 -0800 (PST)

Smile Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:44:45 -0800 (PST)

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:36:11 -0800 (PST)

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:36:15 -0800 (PST)

Stress relief Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:37:31 -0800 (PST)

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:12:01 -0800 (PST)

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:17:19 -0800 (PST)

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:59:51 -0800 (PST)

Sex with a man Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:08:53 -0800 (PST)

Henry Higgins Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:07:31 -0800 (PST)

Re: Prolapsed cord-->language Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:03:29 -0800 (PST)

Legal opinion needed Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:20:52 -0800 (PST)

Legal opinion needed Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:20:52 -0800 (PST)

Re: Prolapsed cord-->language Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:44:23 -0800 (PST)

Re: Prolapsed cord-->language Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:44:23 -0800 (PST)

Re: refutation Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:29:56 -0800 (PST)

refutation Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:01:05 -0800 (PST)

refutation Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:01:05 -0800 (PST)

refutation Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:01:05 -0800 (PST)

refutation Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:01:05 -0800 (PST)

bizarre delilveries Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:22:34 -0800 (PST)

FasterTort Reform Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:04:45 -0800 (PST)

Roadster Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:01:52 -0800 (PST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:00:31 -0800 (PST)

Re: Followup on the weather Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:39:04 -0800 (PST)

Re: Followup on the weather Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:39:04 -0800 (PST)

Re: Followup on the weather Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:39:04 -0800 (PST)

Followup on the weather Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:04:22 -0800 (PST)

Re: OB: No Candid Camera Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:23:48 -0800 (PST)

Violations Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:19:37 -0800 (PST)

Re: Sad but true Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:46:20 -0800 (PST)

Presiden Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:43:09 -0800 (PST)

Re: Cheney Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:52:13 -0800 (PST)

Cheney Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:38:17 -0800 (PST)

Re: FRI Humor: Weapons Of Mass Destruction Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:33:57 -0800 (PST)

Re: Sad but true Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:08:13 -0800 (PST)

Re: Initials Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:04:44 -0800 (PST)

Re: Initials Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:00:13 -0800 (PST)

Re: Initials Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:04:40 -0800 (PST)

Re: Anhydramnion Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:17:07 -0800 (PST)

Initials Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:52:38 -0800 (PST)

A fuzzy behind Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:36:11 -0800 (PST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Thu, 9 Feb 2006 21:34:47 -0800 (PST)

Re: Anhydramnion Thu, 9 Feb 2006 21:23:11 -0800 (PST)

Re: Anhydramnion Thu, 9 Feb 2006 21:23:11 -0800 (PST)

Re: Anhydramnion Thu, 9 Feb 2006 21:20:03 -0800 (PST)

Love that name Thu, 9 Feb 2006 20:31:43 -0800 (PST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Wed, 8 Feb 2006 14:29:32 -0800 (PST)

Re: Off Subj - Winter Olympics Wed, 8 Feb 2006 06:30:10 -0800 (PST)

Re: Cervical length Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:35:04 -0800 (PST)

Re: Fri: Caveman Tue, 7 Feb 2006 12:58:23 -0800 (PST)

Caveman Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:56:11 -0800 (PST)

Cervical length Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:36:06 -0800 (PST)

Did I write that? Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:09:26 -0800 (PST)

igold@cox.net

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:01:02 -0800

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on 'Lay' Midwifery - Long response Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:43:05 -0800

CNM's and RX (was FRI preelampsia) Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:48:04 -0500

Ina May Gaskin

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:40:28 -0800

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:47:20 -0800

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:52:29 -0800

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:48:43 -0800

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:58:19 -0800

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:25:51 -0800

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:49:24 -0800

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:41:51 -0800

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:14:07 -0800

Re: scope of practice Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:13:20 -0800

Re: scope of practice Sat, 11 Feb 2006 12:04:17 -0800

Re: scope of practice Sat, 11 Feb 2006 11:54:20 -0800

Re: scope of practice Sat, 11 Feb 2006 11:49:49 -0800

Re: Ina May Gaskin/Quilt (long) Sat, 11 Feb 2006 11:30:49 -0800

Re: Ina May Gaskin/Quilt Thu, 9 Feb 2006 10:05:15 -0800

Re: scope of practice Thu, 9 Feb 2006 09:41:55 -0800

Re: Contemporary OB/GYN: Legally Speaking: The ME's million Tue, 7 Feb 2006 19:15:59 -0800

Re: Dionne Quints Tue, 7 Feb 2006 19:13:52 -0800

Re: scope of practice Tue, 7 Feb 2006 19:01:22 -0600 (CST)

Jamie

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:22:21 -0600 (CST)

Re: Fundal Pressure Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:17:05 -0600 (CST)

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:44:55 -0600 (CST)

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:45:42 -0600 (CST)

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:26:55 -0600 (CST)

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:22:05 -0600 (CST)

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:12:01 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:38:36 -0600 (CST)

Re: Legal opinion needed Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:58:23 -0600 (CST)

Re: Prolapsed cord-->language Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:08:31 -0600 (CST)

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on 'Lay' Midwifery Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:43:28 -0600 (CST)

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on 'Lay' Midwifery - Long response Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:52:20 -0600 (CST)

Re: OB: No Candid Camera Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:40:08 -0600 (CST)

Re: OB: No Candid Camera Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:16:25 -0600 (CST)

Re: Verdict drives physician into bankruptcy Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:42:04 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Sun, 19 Feb 2006 17:57:56 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:19:59 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:10:22 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:47:42 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:07:32 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:05:40 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:57:03 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:13:33 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:49:20 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:35:05 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:27:13 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:21:14 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:12:49 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:55:53 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:52:19 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:41:18 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:12:07 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:01:53 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:51:48 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:38:46 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:37:13 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:22:38 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:34:32 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:07:22 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:02:23 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:00:48 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:30:54 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:11:26 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:09:55 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:45:20 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:26:59 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:57:38 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Tue, 7 Feb 2006 20:28:35 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Tue, 7 Feb 2006 19:37:45 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Tue, 7 Feb 2006 13:19:49 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Tue, 7 Feb 2006 12:02:12 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Tue, 7 Feb 2006 11:58:10 -0600 (CST)

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:38:52 -0600 (CST)

Re: Neonatal suction Sun, 5 Feb 2006 18:49:03 -0600 (CST)

Re: Midwifery training was Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 18:46:15 -0600 (CST)

Re: Midwifery training was Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:54:53 -0600 (CST)

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:52:54 -0600 (CST)

Re: Breastfeeding in the States Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:41:23 -0600 (CST)

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:30:29 -0600 (CST)

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:14:30 -0600 (CST)

Jane Peterson

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:08:34 -0800

Jane Wines

UK training of midwives Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:19:12 -0800

jane.wines@telus.net

Re: UK training of midwives Sun, 5 Feb 2006 18:24:01 -0800

Re: UK training of midwives Sun, 5 Feb 2006 14:28:39 -0800

Re: UK training of midwives Sun, 5 Feb 2006 13:56:31 -0800

Jefferson Delfino

Re: HUMOR: Ladies Room Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:38:37 -0300

Re: EVRA once again Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:47:06 -0200

EVRA once again Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:52:42 -0200

Joanne Bulley, MD

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:57:58 -0600 (CST)

Re: Gen: SD Senate Passes Abortion Ban Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:29:55 -0600 (CST)

Re: Gyn: Operative Notes Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:37:42 -0600 (CST)

Re: futation Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:32:33 -0600 (CST)

Re: OB: No Candid Camera Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:09:43 -0600 (CST)

Re: Roadster Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:48:42 -0600 (CST)

Re: Roadster Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:39:37 -0600 (CST)

Re: Roadster Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:01:21 -0600 (CST)

HUMOR: Ladies Room Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:16:23 -0600 (CST)

Re: bantering and name calling Sun, 19 Feb 2006 12:10:12 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Sun, 19 Feb 2006 12:05:18 -0600 (CST)

Re: site speed Sun, 19 Feb 2006 12:00:47 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:41:51 -0600 (CST)

Re: Norplant Sun, 19 Feb 2006 00:21:20 -0600 (CST)

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:21:12 -0600 (CST)

Re: Subject: Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:38:02 -0600 (CST)

Re: Initials Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:54:36 -0600 (CST)

Re: CA 125 of 103 Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:44:33 -0600 (CST)

Re: CA 125 of 103 Sat, 11 Feb 2006 17:42:25 -0600 (CST)

Re: CA 125 of 103 Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:25:58 -0600 (CST)

Re: CA 125 of 103 Thu, 9 Feb 2006 12:01:26 -0600 (CST)

Re: CA 125 of 103 Thu, 9 Feb 2006 07:34:46 -0600 (CST)

CA 125 of 103 Wed, 8 Feb 2006 20:51:47 -0600 (CST)

Off Subj - Winter Olympics Tue, 7 Feb 2006 22:41:29 -0600 (CST)

Re: scope of practice Tue, 7 Feb 2006 22:36:10 -0600 (CST)

patient or client? Tue, 7 Feb 2006 20:46:59 -0600 (CST)

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:34:27 -0600 (CST)

Re: Midwifery training was Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:29:28 -0600 (CST)

Re: SuperBowl Sun, 5 Feb 2006 09:55:10 -0600 (CST)

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 09:00:50 -0600 (CST)

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 08:52:30 -0600 (CST)

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sat, 4 Feb 2006 23:35:55 -0600 (CST)

Re: CNM Prescriptive Authority Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:58:54 -0600 (CST)

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:36:40 -0600 (CST)

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:32:47 -0600 (CST)

Endometrium on Megace Fri, 3 Feb 2006 08:33:57 -0600 (CST)

Re: Endometrial ablation Wed, 1 Feb 2006 15:02:12 -0600 (CST)

Joe

Re: Fundal Pressure Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:28:53 -0500

Re: Fetal Pulse Oximetry No Help Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:26:33 -0500

Re: Fundal Pressure Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:30:52 -0500

Re: Ortho Evra Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:18:04 -0500

Re: Gyn: Our friends, the ureters Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:11:25 -0500

Re: CA 125 of 103 Thu, 09 Feb 2006 07:40:53 -0500

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Mon, 06 Feb 2006 09:03:19 -0500

Joe Cutchin

Re: Verdict drives physician into bankruptcy Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:07:03 -0500

Joseph Shaeffer

Re: CNM Prescriptive Authority Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:32:49 -0800

JSBowpat@aol.com

Re: OB: No Candid Camera Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:46:23 EST

Judith Hafeman

Remove my name Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:59:27 -0600

Re: bantering and name calling Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:08:22 -0600

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:49:30 -0600

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:43:24 -0600

Re: Scope of practice Mon, 06 Feb 2006 07:55:37 -0600

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 03 Feb 2006 12:29:27 -0600

Julie Orfirer

Re: Sad but true Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:42:19 -0800 (PST)

Karen Lee

Acid Mantle Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:10:14 -0800 (PST)

Re: Subject: Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:50:30 -0800 (PST)

Kaycnm@aol.com

Re: Legal opinion needed Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:35:15 EST

Re: Legal opinion needed Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:26:51 EST

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:48:17 -0500

Re: OB: No Candid Camera Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:39:02 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sat, 4 Feb 2006 07:41:46 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:40:02 EST

l.glazerman@rcn.com

Re: Ortho Evra Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:43:55 -0500

Re: Sad but true (long) Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:09:00 -0500

Re: 'nuther one Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:03:38 -0500

Re: CA 125 of 103 Thu, 9 Feb 2006 08:58:16 -0500

Larry Glazerman

Re: Ortho Evra Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:32:42 -0500

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:43:24 -0500

Re: Question from a friend of mine Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:42:12 -0500

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:17:44 -0500

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:41:35 -0500

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:49:13 -0500

Cervical screening, WAS: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:26:06 -0500

Re: Verdict drives physician into bankruptcy Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:04:43 -0500

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:11:24 -0500

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:31:50 -0500

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:56:28 -0500

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:55:34 -0500

Re: Endometrial ablation Wed, 1 Feb 2006 22:09:10 -0500

LCLEMOS@aol.com

Re: Fundal Pressure Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:53:09 EST

Re: Fundal Pressure Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:13:05 EST

Re: hugging ureters Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:17:46 EST

Re: Ortho Evra Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:35:32 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:33:33 EST

Re: Cervical screening Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:38:30 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 07:59:56 EST

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:48:56 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:50:34 EST

Re: Off Subj - Winter Olympics Wed, 8 Feb 2006 04:04:42 EST

Lea Harth, Operations Manager

Survey Form for New Medical Device for Preterm Labor (PTL) Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:48:02 -0600 (CST)

Len2976@aol.com

Re: Prolapsed cord Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:27:12 EST

Re: Prolapsed cord Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:14:09 EST

Lynn D. Montgomery, M.D.

Re: Subject: Re:Embryo adoption was Contract Law Found to Govern Disposition of Frozen Embryos in Divorce Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:17:21 -0800

FW: ROE vs WADE Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:53:35 -0800

Re: Verdict drives physician into bankruptcy Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:28:24 -0800

Re: No Candid Camera Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:37:52 -0800

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:30:09 -0800

Re: Norplant Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:28:43 -0800

Re: Bladder and Bowel Question Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:23:45 -0800

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:10:16 -0800

Bladder and Bowel Question Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:31:06 -0800

Re: Music in the OR Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:13:43 -0800

M. Kelly Shanahan, MD,

Re: OB: First trimester medical management of missed Ab Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:55:48 -0600 (CST)

Marie Harkins

Re: Ortho Evra Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:56:32 -0500

Marilyn Ringstaff

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:25:42 -0600 (CST)

Meenan, Anna, Kevin

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:29:50 -0600

FEMA Trailer Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:25:42 -0600

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 13:22:06 -0600

Re: Neonatal suction Sun, 5 Feb 2006 13:18:35 -0600

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 00:24:26 -0600

Re: Neonatal suction Sat, 4 Feb 2006 13:09:34 -0600

Re: Neonatal suction Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:51:52 -0600

mjutras@gate.net

Subject: Re:Embryo adoption was Contract Law Found to Govern Disposition of Frozen Embryos in Divorce Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:05:11 -0500

Subject: Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:36:06 -0500

Myer S. Bornstein

Re: Fundal Pressure Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:34:48 -0500

Re: Cervical screening, WAS: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:56:07 -0500

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:53:58 -0500

Re: ABC Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:01:30 -0500

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:37:50 -0500

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:36:58 -0500

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Mon, 6 Feb 2006 09:08:22 -0500

Re: Neonatal suction Sun, 5 Feb 2006 12:09:39 -0500

Natalie Melanson Martin

Re: Sad but true Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:23:49 -0500

OBGYN.net Newsletter

OBGYN.net Update Newsletter - February 1, 2006 Wed, 1 Feb 2006 14:37:28 -0800

Oblink Newsletter

The 3rd International Preterm Labour Congress Tue, 7 Feb 2006 09:57:55 -0600 (CST)

Paul Gratia

remove Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:29:15 +0100

poongulali selvamuthu

Re: Anhydramnion Thu, 9 Feb 2006 03:17:45 -0800 (PST)

Re: Supine position in pregnancy Thu, 2 Feb 2006 01:34:32 -0800 (PST)

Re: Uterine fundus perforation Thu, 2 Feb 2006 01:07:03 -0800 (PST)

R vd Colf

Re: EVRA once again Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:39:30 +0200

Re: Music in the OR Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:13:49 +0200

R. Daniel Braun

Re: OT/Fri Humor: Everybody Likes To Be Liked Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:33:58 -0500

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 06:50:17 -0500

Re: ACOG Board reverses sanctions against two expert witnesses Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:34:36 -0500

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on "Lay" Midwifery Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:01:33 -0500

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on "Lay" Midwifery Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:10:59 -0500

Re: bantering and name calling Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:17:54 -0500

Re: bantering and name calling Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:33:07 -0500

Re: Roadster Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:31:39 -0500

Re: Roadster Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:44:16 -0500

Re: bantering and name calling Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:33:14 -0500

Re: bantering and name calling Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:31:48 -0500

Re: Norplant Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:30:19 -0500

Re: Jury Clears Merck in First Federal Vioxx Case Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:49:17 -0500

Re: bantering and name calling Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:47:21 -0500

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:35:02 -0500

Re: OB: No Candid Camera Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:23:07 -0500

Re: Neonatal suction Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:40:38 -0500

Rafael Haciski

Re: Ortho Evra Mon, 27 Feb 2006 23:37:50 -0500

Raymond Stephen

Re: Echinococcal cyst in pregnancy Wed, 1 Mar 2006 15:30:23 +1100

Re: so-called abortion pill Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:46:06 +1100

Re: Checking cervices at term Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:21:27 +1100

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Wed, 1 Mar 2006 09:40:22 +1100

Re: Legal opinion needed Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:30:56 +1100

Re: Operative Notes Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:18:05 +1100

Re: Prolapsed cord Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:10:30 +1100

Re: For Gail Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:19:02 +1100

Re: HUMOR: Ladies Room Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:31:18 +1100

Re: OB: First trimester medical management of missed Ab Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:20:15 +1100

Re: Womens' rights Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:11:39 +1100

Re: OB: First trimester medical management of missed Ab Sun, 19 Feb 2006 10:01:18 +1100

Re: bantering and name calling Sun, 19 Feb 2006 09:58:42 +1100

Re: site speed Sun, 19 Feb 2006 09:41:00 +1100

Re: First trimester medical management of missed Ab Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:19:21 +1100

Re: First trimester medical management of missed Ab Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:49:24 +1100

Re: scope of practice Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:55:27 +1100

Re: scope of practice Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:26:46 +1100

Re: Anhydramnion Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:15:58 +1100

Re: CA 125 of 103 Thu, 9 Feb 2006 14:05:05 +1100

Re: scope of practice Wed, 8 Feb 2006 15:23:00 +1100

Re: Scope of practice Wed, 8 Feb 2006 14:57:10 +1100

Re: UK training of midwives Mon, 6 Feb 2006 14:06:39 +1100

Richard Kaplan

Re: CA 125 of 103 Wed, 8 Feb 2006 23:45:39 -0500

Richard Chudacoff

Re: Endometrial ablation Wed, 1 Feb 2006 23:35:20 -0600

Richard Chudacoff, MD

Re: OB: No Candid Camera Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:37:38 -0600

FW: Top Ten Cheney Excuses Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:58:47 -0600

Re: FRI Humor: Weapons Of Mass Destruction Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:08:21 -0600

Re: 'nuther one Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:15:56 -0600

Re: CA 125 of 103 Thu, 9 Feb 2006 16:38:48 -0600

Rita Kucmierz

Re: bantering and name calling Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:46:40 -0600

Re: Norplant Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:25:37 -0600

Re: Initials Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:17:52 -0600

RModugno@aol.com

Re: Gyn: Our friends, the ureters Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:30:59 EST

Re: Gyn: Our friends, the ureters Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:48:04 -0500

Re: Echinococcal cyst in pregnancy Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:12:08 EST

Re: Echinococcal cyst in pregnancy Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:12:14 EST

Re: Checking cervices at term Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:51:32 EST

Re: Gyn: Our friends, the ureters Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:48:35 EST

Re: Prolapsed cord Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:43:33 EST

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:36:36 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:22:56 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:20:49 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:55:16 EST

Re: Ponit taken Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:47:40 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:44:16 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:39:16 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:32:44 EST

Re: Checking cervices at term Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:28:34 EST

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:24:12 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:22:47 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:13:08 EST

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:52:33 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:49:22 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:44:40 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:42:02 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:17:24 EST

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:17:09 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:14:33 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:11:45 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:10:43 EST

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:38:17 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:26:40 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:27:18 EST

Re: UK Pap rules was Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:17:41 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:14:50 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:11:55 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:06:55 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:17:49 EST

Re: Sexual abuse was Spanking babies Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:16:14 EST

Fwd:Fri: Baseball - was legal opinion Sat, 25 Feb 2006 12:04:08 EST

Re: Legal opinion needed Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:46:51 EST

Re: Prolapsed cord Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:32:41 -0500

Re: Prolapsed cord Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:30:46 -0500

Re: article:Medical Protective lowers malpractice rates for Texas doctors Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:25:06 -0500

Gerald & el Thu, 23 Feb 2006 01:54:01 -0500

Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: rmodugno@aol.com Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:17:31 -0500

A washingtonpost.com article from: rmodugno@aol.com Tue, 21 Feb 2006 18:19:22 -0500 (EST)

Re: For Gail Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:45:46 EST

Re: Verdict drives physician into bankruptcy Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:00:10 EST

Re: OB: No Candid Camera Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:34:28 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:38:07 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:58:15 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:43:01 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:12:24 EST

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:09:38 EST

Fwd: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:28:04 EST

Re: Sad but true Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:08:49 -0500

Re: Sad but true Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:13:36 -0500

Re: Sad but true Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:08:34 -0500

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:22:55 -0500

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:00:14 -0500

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:57:00 -0500

Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:21:54 -0500

Re: Music in the OR Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:21:21 -0500

Music in the OR Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:31:28 EST

Re: Initials Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:23:30 -0500

Re: Initials Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:13:58 EST

Re: Anhydramnion Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:50:55 -0500

Re: Anhydramnion Wed, 8 Feb 2006 19:04:34 EST

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Wed, 8 Feb 2006 19:01:17 EST

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Wed, 8 Feb 2006 18:57:25 EST

Re: Fri: VBAC immediately available policy Wed, 08 Feb 2006 10:44:39 -0500

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Tue, 7 Feb 2006 17:04:29 EST

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Tue, 07 Feb 2006 15:39:46 -0500

Re: OPD management? Tue, 07 Feb 2006 15:36:20 -0500

Re: Fri: Caveman Tue, 07 Feb 2006 14:20:02 -0500

Re: Did I write that? Tue, 07 Feb 2006 13:50:51 -0500

Re: Did I write that? Tue, 07 Feb 2006 13:35:33 -0500

Re: Did I write that? Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:43:08 -0500

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:50:05 EST

Re: Scope of practice Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:47:58 EST

Re: VBAC immediately available policy Mon, 6 Feb 2006 09:10:32 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved (long) Mon, 6 Feb 2006 07:20:31 EST

Re: UK training of midwives Sun, 5 Feb 2006 21:10:07 EST

Re: UK training of midwives Sun, 5 Feb 2006 18:10:56 EST

Re: UK training of midwives Sun, 5 Feb 2006 17:39:08 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 17:33:28 EST

Re: SuperBowl Sun, 5 Feb 2006 17:27:26 EST

Re: SuperBowl Sun, 5 Feb 2006 16:52:29 EST

Re: SuperBowl Sun, 5 Feb 2006 16:33:35 EST

Re: UK training of midwives Sun, 5 Feb 2006 16:22:38 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 15:55:36 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 12:56:12 EST

Re: Now it's McCarthy Sun, 5 Feb 2006 12:24:01 EST

Re: SuperBowl Sun, 5 Feb 2006 12:22:39 EST

Re: SuperBowl Sun, 5 Feb 2006 12:17:57 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 12:15:32 EST

Re: FRI Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 09:37:04 EST

Hydraulic fluid instruments at Duke Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:00:40 EST

Endometrial ablation Wed, 1 Feb 2006 14:22:58 EST

Robert Gherman

Sub-lease Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:53:44 -0600 (CST)

Robert Modugno

Mass. officials probe rise in C-sections Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:38 -0500

Helping MDs survive billing cycle Mon, 6 Feb 2006 09:17 -0500

robin2

Re: Tuscon, Arizona Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:18:11 -0600

robyn james

Re: OB-GYN-L digest 4563 Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:37:49 -0800 (PST)

S Osterling M.D.

HRT tuning in a 31 year old woman Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:14:10 -0800

Re: OB: First trimester medical management of missed Ab Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:43:55 -0800

Re: OB: No Candid Camera Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:14:10 -0800

Re: CA 125 of 103 Sat, 11 Feb 2006 14:56:56 -0800

Re: CA 125 of 103 Wed, 8 Feb 2006 19:52:20 -0800

Re: OPD management? Tue, 7 Feb 2006 07:50:43 -0800

Re: OPD management? Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:17:24 -0800

Re: OPD management? Mon, 6 Feb 2006 19:25:44 -0800

no subject received Sun, 5 Feb 2006 16:41:21 -0600 Sun, 5 Feb 2006 14:40:57 -0800

Seele, Mona

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:39:19 -0600

Re: Fundal Pressure Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:26:55 -0600

Stmidwife@aol.com

Re: FRI 2/06 ACOG Statement on 'Lay' Midwifery Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:52:05 EST

Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on "Lay" Midwifery Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:18:52 EST

2/06 ACOG Statement on "Lay" Midwifery Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:10:27 EST

2/06 ACOG statement regarding midwifery Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:14:32 EST

62-Year-Old California Woman Gives Birth to Baby Boy Sun, 19 Feb 2006 12:11:22 EST

Re: No Candid Camera Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:47:08 EST

Off topic Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:18:30 EST

Re: Ina May Gaskin/Quilt Wed, 8 Feb 2006 14:53:38 EST

Midwifery training was Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:31:42 EST

Re: Midwifery training was Preeclampsia Solved Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:22:05 EST

Re: Breastfeeding in the States Sat, 4 Feb 2006 23:12:53 EST

Terrence.Jones@kp.org

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:40:59 -0800

Tobias

Re: so-called abortion pill Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:00:28 -0600 (CST)

so-called abortion pill Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:06:31 -0600 (CST)

Mifepristone ? Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:19:53 -0600 (CST)

William D. McIntosh, M.D

Re: OB: No Candid Camera Tue, 21 Feb 2006 13:28:45 -0600

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:33:56 -0600

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:32:17 -0600

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:40:33 -0600

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:06:43 -0600

William McIntosh

Re: The Death of the Canadian Model Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:17:07 -0600

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:11:18 -0600

Re: Sad but true --->Call the question! Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:32:20 -0600

Re: Subject: Re: Sad but true (long) Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:42:04 -0600

Zachariah Newton

Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: rmodugno@aol.com Wed, 22 Feb 2006 23:56:40 -0500

Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: rmodugno@aol.com Wed, 22 Feb 2006 23:06:24 -0500

zygote@icsi.net

Re: Contract Law Found to Govern Disposition of Frozen Embryos in Divorce Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:58:47 -0600

Re: Contract Law Found to Govern Disposition of Frozen Embryos in Divorce Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:58:05 -0600

Re: Womens' rights Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:00:21 -0600

Re: Womens' rights Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:00:02 -0600

Re: Shoulder Dystocia --------OB: No Candid Camera Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:15:58 -0600

Re: Pathetically True Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:35:20 -0600

Re: Fwd: A license to kill Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:15:58 -0600

Re: Preeclampsia Solved Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:29:34 -0600

Last message date: Tue Feb 28 21:33:29 2006
Archived on: Mon Nov 2 05:01:54 2009

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]
Return to archive index

Return to Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:01:54 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.