![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: 2/06 ACOG Statement on "Lay" Midwifery - Long responseFrom: fran wilson (530rose@msn.com)Wed Feb 22 13:27:24 2006
In order to facilitate the acceptance of non-nurse midwives, some educational and professional standards need to be in place. If the only way that most of the American medical establishment will feel comfortable collaborating and consulting with us, I don't see why that is a problem. If a physician (or a patient, or an assistant) have no idea of the midwifes basic level of competency, how can anyone just agree to be available when medical management is needed, and TRUST us to know when that is? We need to face that we need MD's more than they need us, and they have the right to establish standards that work for them. The next step is to get the word "nurse" removed from our title (hence, Certified Midwife). Even for those of us who once were, our practice now is much closer to a physician than a nurse. I could no more work as a nurse than sprout wings and fly. In fact, more nurse midwives train residents than train nursing students. Then we get the American Midwifery Certification Board (AMCB)to accept the NARM exam as the standard upon which all of our competency is judged (which is at least as stringent in the care of normal and the recognition of abnormal pregnancy, birth, and newborn as the ACNM exam that I took) and get them to accredit programs like the Seattle Midwifery School (the only one of which I am sufficiently familiar to comment). Then we all take the same test, we all use the same initials, and we can stop the turf wars amongst ourselves (midwives). Some os us just took the nursing detour (variety of reasons, most having to do with few other avenues to midwifery when we were starting out). I see this as the easiest way to have insurance reimbursement, prescriptive authority, and acceptance of midwifery as a profession attained by midwives in general. Then we can drop the ridicuous "P" from CPM (how many MD's need "PMD" to verify their professional status - it is a given). So ACOG has given us, really for the first time, a way for non-nurses to collaborate professionally with them. Thank them, and lets get to work on the AMCB! Fran Wilson CNM From: "R. Daniel Braun" <rd.braun@gmail.com>
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 05:06:33 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.