-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: 41 week Induction From: rmodugno@aol.com Mon Dec 5 06:51:26 2005 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Dean Huffman .: "FDA Notice About Contraceptive Patch Sparks Suits" Previous message: rmodugno@aol.com: "Re: 41 week Induction" In reply to: Raymond Stephen: "Re: 41 week Induction" Next in thread: Andrew Folley: "Re: 41 week Induction" Reply: Andrew Folley: "Re: 41 week Induction" And there's the rub - after 40.5 weeks is the baby better off out than in? Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG Marietta, GA -----Original Message----- From: Raymond Stephen <stephen.raymond@dhhs.tas.gov.au> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net> Sent: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 22:10:33 -0600 Subject: Re: 41 week Induction Only those where the baby is better out than in. Steve -----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Dr Eberhard W Lisse Sent: Monday, 5 December 2005 2:55 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: 41 week Induction In message <4536092D6B1A8140A17AEDB95566284806C61CAF@RHHLEX01.health.local>, "R aymond Stephen" writes: > In my training no emphasis was placed on the "latent phase of labour" > probably because I was brought up in the era of "active management". > In South Africa however there was a whole list of definitions of what > constituted "active phase" and distinctions between "active" and > "latent phase". It scared the hell out of me because junior residents > would dismiss patients with no progress as being still in latent > phase, and there were occasions when this contributed to morbidity. > For this reason I have always been unhappy with those who come in and > niggle, and would rather see them augmented. I totally agree. How many patients do you induce? el Tasmania Together 5 Year Review: Have your say http://www.tasmaniatogether.tas.gov.au/ Next message: Dean Huffman .: "FDA Notice About Contraceptive Patch Sparks Suits" Previous message: rmodugno@aol.com: "Re: 41 week Induction" In reply to: Raymond Stephen: "Re: 41 week Induction" Next in thread: Andrew Folley: "Re: 41 week Induction" Reply: Andrew Folley: "Re: 41 week Induction"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:41:56 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.