Re: Breech birth [Now Professional Liability Litigation]

From: Dean Huffman . (dean@thehuffpeople.net)
Mon Nov 28 15:10:42 2005


..

Along those lines ...

Once I was named in a professional liability case by mistake. The attorney for the plaintiff was so incompetant that he did not even review the records from my hospital or office -- just from the record of the patient at the hospital from which she was transferred.

It turns out that somebody else, whose name is similar to mine, was the MFM to take care of her, but I was named (similar sounding name) rather than him.

After a few months, I was dropped from the case on summary judgement. Nevertheless I always have to say, "Yes, I have been named in professional litigation." and to give the caption and details of the case.

Dean Huffman

- - - -

Quoting Charlie Chambers <ricechaz@gorge.net>: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 15:31:13 -0600

> Some excellent points. Plus, the possibility that you may not be
> insurable meaning that you may be unemployable. One thing to lose a
> malpractice case, but to be forced out of careers that we all have
> trained long and hard is unacceptable.
> On Nov 28, 2005, at 10:14 AM, ENDODOK@aol.com wrote:
>
> > It is so easy for the inexperienced (ie never sued) individual
> > to scream loudly about choice. They do not understand the financial
> > and mental stress associated with any lawsuit- filed, threatened,
> > settled or dropped. We are required by our liability carriers to
> > inform them of any possible suit thus a potential claim file is
> > opened. Even if ultimately the case goes nowhere, or if filed and
> > dropped, the physician is "tagged" so to speak, and as these
> > reported potential cases accumulate, the companies are spending
> > money, and this results in surcharges that push liability premiums
> > higher and higher.
> > Being vindicated in a filed suit that went to court is of no
> > solice, as those defense costs ( which can easily cost over a
> > $100,000) are part of a doctor's run/loss record, which is
> > recovered by the insurance company by large surcharges. The
> > patient's consent may not carry the verdict for the defense.
> > Acknowledging procedures that carry significant risk for a
> > suboptimal result (eg VBAC/rupture/ maternal and/or fetal injury/
> > death), the defense has to be avoidance of such situations.
> > Personally, I am awaiting next year's liability statement from
> > my carrier. It may be the last straw for me to continue medical
> > practice.
> >
> > JGB
>
> ************************************************************************
> ****
> Charlie Chambers

> Hood River, OR
> cchamber@alumni.rice.edu
>
> "Almost anything you do will seem insignificant but it is very important
> that you do it....You must be the change you wish to see in the world"
> -- Mahatma Ghandi.
> ************************************************************************
> *******
>

>





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 05:05:23 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.