-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Amnioinfusion From: R. Daniel Braun (rd.braun@gmail.com) Sat Nov 26 20:23:27 2005 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Larry Glazerman: "Re: Dysplasia question" Previous message: Peter Wein: "Re: Dysplasia question" In reply to: Andrew Folley: "Re: Amnioinfusion" Next in thread: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: Amnioinfusion" Reply: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: Amnioinfusion" I believe that the study showing that was a little underpowered to prove NO benefit. I would have to go look it up to see for sure. If I remember correctly when this all first came out, someone calculated that a study would have to have several thousand patients in each arm to show a 50% reduction in the incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome. Since it is easier to show a positive effect, it would seem likely that at least that many would be needed to show an absence of effect. Dan On 11/26/05, Andrew Folley <agfolley@hotmail.com> wrote: > > On a side not, I believe the literature is now saying amnioinfusion not > beneficial for meconium. Still may have some benefits for variable. > someone check me on this. andrew > > >From: "R. Daniel Braun" <rd.braun@gmail.com> > >Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net > >To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net> > >Subject: Re: Amnioinfusion > >Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 07:09:54 -0600 > > > >Concur with Larry. Never heard of such a thing. > >Dan > > > >On 11/25/05, dmecnm@aol.com <dmecnm@aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > G1 in active labor. 4-5 cms dilated. SROM, clear fluid. Moderate > > > variable decels. IUPC and FSE already in place. > >Amnioinfusionrecommended. 4th year resident said it was "too > > > early to do an amnioinfusion." She said that there were studies > showing > > > that women who have amnioinfusions for extended periods of time absorb > >the > > > solution and then have electrolyte imbalances from the infusion *AND > >*the > > > uterine muscle fibers would absorb the fluid causing an increased > >uterine to! > > > ne that was irreversible. > > > > > > This is new to me. Can someone give me more information regarding > these > > > two statements? > > > > > > Denise, CNM > > > So Cal > > > > > > >-- > >R. Daniel Braun > > Kinky for Governor > -- R. Daniel Braun Kinky for Governor Next message: Larry Glazerman: "Re: Dysplasia question" Previous message: Peter Wein: "Re: Dysplasia question" In reply to: Andrew Folley: "Re: Amnioinfusion" Next in thread: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: Amnioinfusion" Reply: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: Amnioinfusion"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:00:22 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.