Re: To FACOGs

From: Gerald P. Rodríguez (geraldpr@cybermesa.com)
Mon Nov 21 20:16:51 2005


De aquerdo, Ef. I totally agree.

Gerald P. Rodríguez, M.D., FACOG Santa Fe

>----- Original Message -----
From: "Efrain Ramirez" <eramirezt@coqui.net> To: "Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L" <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 8:07 PM Subject: Re: To FACOGs

> Right - so all this discussion about home delivery - at least in USA is
> --useless- at least for me--no way am I going to endorse a home delivery
> - neither medically nor morally.. and yeah - I could be wrong.
>
> Ef
>
> At Mon, 21 Nov 2005, DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>In a message dated 11/21/05 8:48:51 PM, eramirezt@coqui.net writes:
>>
>>> Maybe I am wrong but it stated...baci in 2002 Compendium .." Labor and
>>> delivery, while a phisiologic process, clearly presents potential
>>> hazards to both mother and the fetus before and after birth. These
>>> hazards require standards of safety which are provided in the hospital
>>> setting and cannot be matched in the home situation. We support those
>>> actions that improve the experience of the family while continuing to
>>> provide the mother and her infant with accepted standards of safety
>>> available only in hospitals which conform to standards as outlined by
>>> the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of
>>> Obstetricians and Gynecologist"
>>>
>>> Those statements are carved in granite in every lawyer's desk....
>>>
>>Remember what the deal is - to improve on Mother Nature. That's the cause
>>a d
>>aim of "civilization" as we know it.
>>
>>Before civilization, EVERYONE had a "home birth." I've witnessed the grave
>>stones attesting to that heritage. Things have only gotten better. To
>>regre s is
>>foolish.
>>
>>ACOG is (apparently) attempting to support a "home birth" experience in a
>>setting that provides all the modern safeguards. Make the mother comfy but
>>et a
>>good outcome.
>>
>>To provide a "home birth" experience at "home" or in a rice paddy or in a
>>cave, while it may be attractive to some, subverts and obstructs the
>>advanc of
>>civilization. Hugging a tree does not make it a wooden house. Mother
>>Nature has
>>many notches on her guns.
>>
>>Remember, as much as "home delivery" was the rule, the Chamberlins and
>>thei
>>mysterious instrument was a good thing. The Kaiser and his snit was a good
>>thing. And one can go on and on.
>>
>>So yes, IMHO, ACOG got THIS one right. It's not their habit, but it worked
>>this time.
>>
>>Joe P.
>
> --
> Have the courage to be ignorant of a great number of things, in order
> to avoid the calamity of being ignorant of everything.
> Sydney Smith (1771 - 1845)
>
> ~walt whitman~
>





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 04:47:57 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.