-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: To FACOGs From: DoctorJoe@aol.com Mon Nov 21 19:55:55 2005 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: To FACOGs" Previous message: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: To FACOGs" Maybe in reply to: Bernard Cristalli: "To FACOGs" Next in thread: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: To FACOGs" Reply: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: To FACOGs" Reply: Jamie: "Re: To FACOGs" In a message dated 11/21/05 8:48:51 PM, eramirezt@coqui.net writes: > Maybe I am wrong but it stated...baci in 2002 Compendium .." Labor and > delivery, while a phisiologic process, clearly presents potential > hazards to both mother and the fetus before and after birth.  These > hazards require standards of safety which are provided in the hospital > setting and cannot be matched in the home situation.  We support those > actions that improve the experience of the family while continuing to > provide the mother and her infant with accepted standards of safety > available only in hospitals which conform to standards as outlined by > the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of > Obstetricians and Gynecologist" > > Those statements are carved in granite in every lawyer's desk.... > Remember what the deal is - to improve on Mother Nature. That's the cause and aim of "civilization" as we know it. Before civilization, EVERYONE had a "home birth." I've witnessed the grave stones attesting to that heritage. Things have only gotten better. To regress is foolish. ACOG is (apparently) attempting to support a "home birth" experience in a setting that provides all the modern safeguards. Make the mother comfy but get a good outcome. To provide a "home birth" experience at "home" or in a rice paddy or in a cave, while it may be attractive to some, subverts and obstructs the advance of civilization. Hugging a tree does not make it a wooden house. Mother Nature has many notches on her guns. Remember, as much as "home delivery" was the rule, the Chamberlins and their mysterious instrument was a good thing. The Kaiser and his snit was a good thing. And one can go on and on. So yes, IMHO, ACOG got THIS one right. It's not their habit, but it worked this time. Joe P. Next message: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: To FACOGs" Previous message: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: To FACOGs" Maybe in reply to: Bernard Cristalli: "To FACOGs" Next in thread: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: To FACOGs" Reply: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: To FACOGs" Reply: Jamie: "Re: To FACOGs"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:50:43 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.