Re: Catgut

From: Atkinson, Samuel M (ATKINSONS@mail.ecu.edu)
Mon Aug 8 11:31:44 2005


Vicryl Rapide dissolves as quickly as plain catgut and does not have its' inflammatory characteristics Sam

________________________________

From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net on behalf of Bernard Cristalli

--
________________________________
Sent: Mon 8/8/2005 12:07 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
Subject: Re: Catgut

I understand the high rate of failure. BC

Charlie Chambers a écrit :

Yep, plain gut for Pomeroy's. Any modification has merely decreased the efficacy, such as other suture materials, cautery of the cut ends, etc. ****************************************************************************=20 Charlie Chambers=20

Hood River, OR USA cchamber@alumni.rice.edu "...not because I regard fishing as being so terribly important but because I suspect that so many of the other concerns of men are equally unimportant-and not nearly so much fun." John Voelker *****************************************************************************=20 On Aug 8, 2005, at 4:17 AM, Larry Glazerman wrote:=20

My understanding is that the original work by Pomeroy used the fact that when catgut was used, the two ends of the tube didn't stay in approximation for very long, therefore the risk of fistula was decreased. I can't prove that, but that's why I remember always using catgut for tubals

Larry R. Glazerman, MD Ob-Gyn at Trexlertown, PC 610-402-0161 l.glazerman@rcn.com<//a> <unknown.jpg> From: <mailto:l.glazerman@rcn.com> ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Bernard Cristalli Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 2:59 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Catgut

That's gambling. What you want is temporary TL? BC Elrod Darryl G MAJ 48 MDOS/SGOBO a écrit : I only use plain gut for postpartum or c-section tubal ligations. I can't think of any place else it would benefit. Glen

From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Henry Gregor Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 8:38 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Catgut

Good - very good - observations by Sam. Prompts the additional question of is there a desirable time/place/procedure in any surgery for which catgut would be a preferred suture? Probably not, I suspect but all thoughts welcome.

Hank Gregor "Atkinson, Samuel M" <ATKINSONS@mail.ecu.edu> <mailto:ATKINSONS@mail.ecu.edu> < wrote:

You will find the complete reference on the subject in the August issue of Obstetrics and Gynecology (The Green Journal on page 275.) Reference 6 is the article by Tulandi et al from Montreal published in 1988 in AJOG stated that there were more adhesions when the peritoneum was closed. In a recent publication letter to the editor they again referenced their article which, evidently very few people ever read. NO WONDER . They closed the peritoneum with PLAIN CATGUT-the most inflammatory suture one can use. To quote Michelle Duchinski in TeLinde "...disadvantages include intense inflammatory scarring ." "Catgut should not be routinely used in gynecologic surgery. Indeed there remains little indication for the use of catgut in any gynecologic surgical procedure." P 232, seventh edition. No wonder they found more adhesions in reperitonealized patients. Two horrible wrongs do not equal a right. At last, a level II data paper putting an end to this BS. I suspect our other subscriber who entered the bladder -when she looks up the previous OP note-will find that the peritoneum was not closed-thus the bladder was adherent to the ant abdominal wall and no way could one avoid a bladder entry. By using a monofilament, poly gycolic fine suture and not pulling the peritoneum up tight into a water tight seal, as many of us were taught in the dark ages, there will be significantly less adhesions than if one leaves the peritoneum open. Loosely approximate with non braided polyglycolic suture. Sam Atkinson

From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Julio Arellano Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 10:39 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: New paper - Peritoneum closure

Dear colleagues: A new outlook on parietal peritoneum closure in c-section:

http://www.pslgroup.com/dg/251a56.htm <http://www.pslgroup.com/dg/251a56.httm>

I'd like to know your opinion on this matter (here, in my country, we still discuss about it).

Julio C. Arellano

La Plata. Buenos Aires. Argentina. aarellano@netverk.com.ar <mailto:arellano@netverk.com.ar>

"Good judgment comes from experience, and often experience comes from bad judgment." Rita Mae Brown

<imstp_emo_es.gif>

Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around htttp://mail.yahoo..com <http://mail.yahoo..com>





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 05:04:27 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.