Re: Catgut

From: Bernard Cristalli (bcrist@club-internet.fr)
Mon Aug 8 03:14:57 2005


Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I use permanent suture. Would you use Vicryl clips to perform a LT? BC

Elrod Darryl G MAJ 48 MDOS/SGOBO a écrit :

> Why is it gambling? I thought the idea was to have the suture
> dissolve quickly so the tubes fell apart faster. (or so its told in
> residency)
>
> What do you use for Parkland or Pomeroy tubals?
>
> Glen
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------->
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------> *From:* ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] *On Behalf Of
> *Bernard Cristalli
> *Sent:* Monday, August 08, 2005 7:59 AM
> *To:* Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
> *Subject:* Re: Catgut
>
> That's gambling.
> What you want is temporary TL?
> BC
>
> Elrod Darryl G MAJ 48 MDOS/SGOBO a écrit :
>
> I only use plain gut for postpartum or c-section tubal ligations. I
> can't think of any place else it would benefit.
>
> Glen
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------->
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------> *From:* ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net <mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net>
> [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net <mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net>] *On Behalf Of
> *Henry Gregor
> *Sent:* Friday, August 05, 2005 8:38 PM
> *To:* Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
> *Subject:* Catgut
>
> Good - very good - observations by Sam. Prompts the additional
> question of is there a desirable time/place/procedure in any surgery
> for which catgut would be a preferred suture? Probably not, I suspect
> but all thoughts welcome.
>
> Hank Gregor
>
> */"Atkinson, Samuel M" <ATKINSONS@mail.ecu.edu>
> <mailto:ATKINSONS@mail.ecu.edu>/* wrote:
>
> You will find the complete reference on the subject in the August
> issue of Obstetrics and Gynecology (The Green Journal on page 275.)
>
> Reference 6 is the article by Tulandi et al from Montreal
> published in 1988 in AJOG stated that there were more adhesions
> when the peritoneum was closed. In a recent publication letter to
> the editor they again referenced their article which, evidently
> very few people ever read. NO WONDER . They closed the
> peritoneum with PLAIN CATGUT-the most inflammatory suture one can
> use. To quote Michelle Duchinski in TeLinde "...disadvantages
> include intense inflammatory scarring ." "Catgut should not be
> routinely used in gynecologic surgery. Indeed there remains little
> indication for the use of catgut in any gynecologic surgical
> procedure." P 232, seventh edition. No wonder they found more
> adhesions in reperitonealized patients. Two horrible wrongs do
> not equal a right. At last, a level II data paper putting an end
> to this BS.
>
> I suspect our other subscriber who entered the bladder -when she
> looks up the previous OP note-will find that the peritoneum was
> not closed-thus the bladder was adherent to the ant abdominal wall
> and no way could one avoid a bladder entry.
>
> By using a monofilament, poly gycolic fine suture and not pulling
> the peritoneum up tight into a water tight seal, as many of us
> were taught in the dark ages, there will be significantly less
> adhesions than if one leaves the peritoneum open. Loosely
> approximate with non braided polyglycolic suture.
>
> Sam Atkinson
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------------------------------->
> -------------------------------------------------------------------> *From:* ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net <mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net>
> [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net <mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net>] *On Behalf
> Of *Julio Arellano
> *Sent:* Monday, August 01, 2005 10:39 PM
> *To:* Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
> *Subject:* New paper - Peritoneum closure
>
> Dear colleagues:
>
> A new outlook on parietal peritoneum closure in c-section:
>
> http://www.pslgroup.com/dg/251a56.htm
>
> I'd like to know your opinion on this matter (here, in my
> country, we still discuss about it).
>
> Julio C. Arellano
>
> La Plata. Buenos Aires.
>
> Argentina.
>
> arellano@netverk.com.ar <mailto:arellano@netverk.com.ar>
>
> "Good judgment comes from experience, and often experience comes
> from bad judgment."
> Rita Mae Brown
>
>
>
>
>
> Add FUN to your email - CLICK HERE!
> <http://www.incredimail.com/index.asp?id=54759>
>
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:49:47 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.