|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Incompentent Cervix?--->med-leg ramificationsFrom: DoctorJoe@aol.comSun Jun 26 12:11:54 2005
In a message dated 6/26/05 11:08:26 AM, zygote@icsi.net writes:
> To me there is no truth. Given the first circumstance and placement of Hmmmmm. So IF there is no truth, does it follow that a practitioner who (1) does (or who does not) place a cerclage, and who (2) can articulate reasonable medical rationale for his actions, would be defendable in a court of law? In a hospital credentialling situation? Against an ACOG inquisitional committee? How's that for a medico-legal question? Joe P. P.S. Of course, this question may be generalized to ANY medical treatment or procedure which does not have conclusive EBM/literature support for or against it.
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Fri May 2 04:41:20 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.